Home JOURNAL HEADINGS Author Index SUBJECT INDEX INDEX OF ORGANIZATIONS Article Index
 
Arctic: ecology and economy
ISSN 2223-4594 | ISSN 2949-110X
Advanced
Search
RuEn
ABOUT|EDITORIAL|INFO|ARCHIVE|FOR AUTHORS|SUBSCRIBE|CONTACTS
Home ї Archive of journals ї Volume 12, No. 4, 2022 ї Application of Digital Technologies for Investment Evaluation of Mining Projects in the Western part of the Arctic

APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR INVESTMENT EVALUATION OF MINING PROJECTS IN THE WESTERN PART OF THE ARCTIC

JOURNAL: Volume 12, No. 4, 2022, p. 524-537

HEADING: Study and development of nature resources of the Arctic

AUTHORS: Lukichev, S.V., Nagovitsyn, O.V., Churkin, O.E., Gilyarova, A.A.

ORGANIZATIONS: Mining Institute of the Kola Science Center of RAS

DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2022-4-524-537

The article was received on: 03.05.2022

Keywords: mining projects, Western Arctic, promising deposits, investment appraisal, digital technologies

Bibliographic description: Lukichev, S.V., Nagovitsyn, O.V., Churkin, O.E., Gilyarova, A.A. Application of Digital Technologies for Investment Evaluation of Mining Projects in the Western part of the Arctic. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 524-537. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2022-4-524-537. (In Russian).


Abstract:

The authors consider the mining-geological and technical-economic conditions of promising ore deposits in the Western part of the Arctic of the Russian Federation and analyze the existing methods for evaluating investment projects. They have revealed that the methods do not take into account the intensive introduction of digital technologies, automation and robotization of machines and equipment into the mining industry. The authors substantiate the necessity of using digital technologies in the investment appraisal of mining projects. The study objective is the developing of an improved method for investment appraisal in the Western Arctic mining projects. The authors suggest a methodical approach based on parametric and scenario modeling, which allows minimizing the influence of uncertainty factors and increasing the efficiency of decision-making. Thus, for the practical implementation of the approach in the investment appraisal of mining projects, taking into account digital technologies, they propose an algorithm that includes six effective steps. A distinctive feature of the approach is the use of methods for modeling mining equipment objects. The mining and geological information system MINEFRAME, created at the Mining Institute of the KSC RAS, has the necessary functionality. An investment appraisal of 13 promising deposits as mining projects is completed. The authors select nine (9) deposits that best meet the criteria of economic feasibility. Types of ore minerals: titanium, rare earth elements, lithium, vanadium group the selected deposits and ranked according to investment evaluation indicators. The authors propose economically justified and effective scenarios for involving investment-attractive deposits in the economic turnover. Both the integration of mining projects into closely located mining enterprises and their autonomous development are envisaged.


References:
  1. Bortnikov N. S., Lobanov K. V., Volkov A. V., Galyamov A. L., Murashov K. Yu. Arctic resources of non-ferrous and noble metals in the global perspective. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: ecology and economy], 2015, no. 1 (17), pp. 38—46. (In Russian).
  2. Kostyuchenko S. L. Strategy for the Development of Mineral Resources of the Russian Arctic. Mineral’nye resursy Rossii. Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2017, no. 1, pp. 3—12. (In Russian).
  3. Mashkovtsev G. A., Sporykhina L. V., Byhovskii L. Z. The state, prospects for the use and development of the raw material base of solid minerals in the Arctic zone of Russia. Mineral’nye resursy Rossii. Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2019, no. 3 (166), pp. 34—45. (In Russian).
  4. Lukichev S. V., Zhirov D. V., Churkin O. E. The state and prospects for the development of the mineral resource complex of the Murmansk region. Gornyi zhurnal, 2019, no. 6, pp. 19—24. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2019.06.01. (In Russian).
  5. Melnikov N., Giliarova A., Kalashnik A., Churkin O. Methodical approaches for feasibility study of potential development of arctic mineral deposits. 17th International multidisciplinary scientific Geoconference SGEM 2017. Conference proceedings, 2017, pp. 549—554.
  6. Official website of the Federal Budgetary Institution State Commission on Mineral Reserves. Available at: https://gkz-rf.ru/. (In Russian).
  7. State Report “On the state and use of mineral resources of the Russian Federation in 2020”. Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation. Federal Agency for Subsoil Use. Moscow, 2021, 572 p. (In Russian).
  8. Churkin O. E., Gilyarova A. A. Database of promising mineral resources of the Murmansk region as the basis of a digital platform for assessing the investment attractiveness of their development. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten’, 2019, no. 37, pp. 300—308. DOI: 10.25018/0236--0450-2019. (In Russian).
  9. Lukichev S. V. Digital Past, Present and Future of Mining. Gornaya promyshlennost’, 2021, no. 4, pp. 73—79. DOI:10.30686/1609-9192-2021-4-73-79. (In Russian).
  10. Digital Russia: a new reality. 2017. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/global-locations/europe-and-middleeast/Russia/ru/our-work/McKinney-digital/. (In Russian).
  11. Lukichev S. V., Nagovitsyn O. V., Il’in E. A., Rudin R. S. Digital mining engineering is the first step towards smart mining. Gornyi zhurnal, 2018, no. 7, pp. 86—90. DOI:10.17580/gzh.2018.07.17. (In Russian).
  12. Digitalization of coal and metal. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4103010/. (In Russian).
  13. Burukina A. A. Methods and models for Evaluating Project Performance. Aktual’nye issledovaniya, 2020, no. 8 (11), pp. 107—110. (In Russian).
  14. Damodaran A. Investment valuation. Instruments and techniques for the valuation of any assets. Moscow, Al’pina Pablisher, 2019,1316 p. (In Russian).
  15. Mal’tsev A. S. Numerical methods of discount rate analysis. Rynok tsennykh bumag, 2005, no. 10 (289), pp. 62—65. (In Russian).
  16. International Valuation Standarts (IVS). Effective 31 January 2020. Intern. Valuation Standards Council. Norwich, Page Bros, 2020, 138 p.
  17. Nunes C., Pimentel R. Analytical solution for an investment problem under uncertainties with shocks. European J. of Operational Research, 2017, vol. 259 (3), pp. 1054—1063. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.008.
  18. Behrens W., Hawranek P. M. Manual for the Preparation of Industrial Feasibility Studies. Newly revised and expanded ed. Vienna, UNIDO, 1991, 404 p.
  19. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis is of Investment Projects. European Commission. December 2014. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/cba_guide.pdf.
  20. Kossov V. V., Livshits V. N., Shakhnazarov A. G. Guidelines for Assessing the Effectiveness of Investment Projects. Moscow, Ekonomika-2000, 2000, 421 p. (In Russian).
  21. Methodological Recommendations for Feasibility Study of Conditions for Estimation of Reserves of Solid Mineral Deposits (except Coal and Oil Shale). Moscow, GKZ, 2007, 49 p. (In Russian).
  22. Digital Strategy 2025. Available at: Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. Available at: https://www.de.digital/DIGITAL/Redaktion/EN/Publikation/digital-strategy2025.pdf.
  23. Digital Transformation is More than Just Automation. Agreement Express. Available at: https://agreementexpress.com/digital-transformation-is-more-than-just-automation.
  24. Revitalizing Japan by Realizing Society 5.0: Action Plan for Creating the Society of the Future. Overview. Available at: http://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2017/010_overview.pdf.
  25. Worldwide Spending on Digital Transformation Will Be Nearly $2 Trillion in 2022 as Organizations Commit to DX, According to a New IDC Spending Guide. International Data Corporation. Available at: https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS44440318.
  26. Gilyarova A. A. Mining industry: approaches to economic accounting of modern geotechnologies and innovations. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka, 2020, no. 1 (67), no. 6, pp. 117—126. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.1.2020.67.01. (In Russian).
  27. Marklund S. The comparison of automatic and manual Loading in an underground mining environment. Luleå University of Technology. Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering. Luleå, 2017, 70 p.

Download »


© 2011-2024 Arctic: ecology and economy
DOI 10.25283/2223-4594