Home JOURNAL HEADINGS Author Index SUBJECT INDEX INDEX OF ORGANIZATIONS Article Index
 
Arctic: ecology and economy
ISSN 2223-4594 | ISSN 2949-110X
Advanced
Search
RuEn
ABOUT|EDITORIAL|INFO|ARCHIVE|FOR AUTHORS|SUBSCRIBE|CONTACTS
Home » Archive of journals » Volume 16, No. 3, 2026 » Extreme growth and explosion of the C19 gas-dynamic heaving mound on the Yamal Peninsula in 2020

EXTREME GROWTH AND EXPLOSION OF THE C19 GAS-DYNAMIC HEAVING MOUND ON THE YAMAL PENINSULA IN 2020

JOURNAL: Volume 16, No. 3, 2026, p. 361-373

HEADING: Research activities in the Arctic

AUTHORS: Bogoyavlensky, V.I., Bogoyavlensky, I.V., Nikonov, R.A., Polozov, V.N., Osokin, A.B.

ORGANIZATIONS: Oil and Gas Research Institute of RAS, Gazprom Dobycha Nadym Ltd.

DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2026-3-361-373

UDC: 502.171, 504.4, 504.7, 553.981.2

The article was received on: 25.05.2026

Keywords: gas blowout (emission), remote sensing of the Earth, crater, Yamal peninsula, permafrost, digital elevation model (DEM), ArcticDEM, perennial heaving mounds (PHM), East-Bovanenkovo Field

Bibliographic description: Bogoyavlensky, V.I., Bogoyavlensky, I.V., Nikonov, R.A., Polozov, V.N., Osokin, A.B. Extreme growth and explosion of the C19 gas-dynamic heaving mound on the Yamal Peninsula in 2020. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2026, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 361-373. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2026-3-361-373. (In Russian).


Abstract:

Based on an analysis of satellite imagery combined with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), it was determined that the explosion of perennial gas-dynamic heaving mound C19 on the Yamal Peninsula occurred in period between September 24 and October 5, 2020. Its development monitoring using the ArcticDEM digital elevation model revealed that in the year preceding the explosion and formation of the crater C19 (2019—2020), extreme growth of the central and northern parts of the mound occurred with average annual rates of approximately 54 and 67 cm/year, which is 4.0-4.9 times higher than at the initial stage of monitoring in 2013—2016. In methodological terms, to improve the reliability of forecasting future explosions of potential gas-dynamic heaving mounds, it is recommended to conduct annual monitoring of their development during summer periods characterized by the most consistent phenological state of the vegetation.


Finance info: The research was carried out according to the state assignment of the Oil and Gas Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (OGRI RAS) on the topic “Improving the efficiency and environmental safety of the oil and gas resources development in the Arctic and Subarctic zones of Russia in a changing climate” (no. 122022800264-9). The authors express their gratitude to the management of Gazprom Dobycha Nadym LLC, for providing support to the field research of the OGRI RAS based on the Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation.

References:

1. Oblogov G. E., Vasiliev A. A., Streletskiy D. A. et al. Localized vegetation, soil moisture, and ice content offset permafrost degradation under climate warming. Geosciences, 2023, vol. 13, no. 5, art. 129. DOI: 10.3390/geosciences13050129.

2. Turetsky M. R., Abbott M. R., Jones M. C. et al. Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw. Nature Geoscience, 2020, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 138—143. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-019-0526-0.

3. Torn M. S., Abramoff R. Z., Vaughn L. J. S., Chafe O. E. H. et al. Large emissions of CO2 and CH4 due to active-layer warming in Arctic tundra. Nature Communications, 2025, vol. 16, art. 46, 12 p. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54990-9.

4. Chuvilin E. M., Yakushev V. S., Perlova E. V. Gas and possible gas hydrates in the permafrost of Bovanenkovo gas field, Yamal Peninsula, West Siberia. Polarforschung, 2000, vol. 68, no. 1—3, pp. 215—219.

5. Chuvilin E., Grebenkin S., Zhmaev M. Gas permeability of sandy sediments: effects of phase changes in pore ice and gas hydrates. Energy and Fuels, 2021, vol. 35, no. 9. pp. 7874—7882. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00366.

6. Arzhanov M. M., Malakhova V. V. Modeling the conditions for the accumulation and transition to a relict state of methane hydrates in the cryolithozone of northern Western Siberia. Physics of the Solid Earth, 2023, no. 2, pp. 149—161. DOI: 10.31857/S0002333723020047. (In Russian).

7. Bogoyavlensky V. I. The threat of catastrophic gas blowouts from the Arctic cryolithozone. Yamal and Taymyr craters. Oil and Drilling, 2014, no. 9, pp. 13—18. (In Russian).

8. Bogoyavlensky V. I. Natural and technogenic threats in fossil fuels production in the Earth cryolithosphere. Russian Mining Industry, 2020, no. 1 (149), pp. 97—118. DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2020-1-97-118. (In Russian).

9. Bogoyavlensky V. I. Fundamental aspects of the catastrophic gas blowout genesis and the formation of giant craters in the Arctic. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51—66. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2021-1-51-66. (In Russian).

10. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Nikonov R. A. Results of aerial, space and field investigations of large gas blowouts near Bovanenkovo field on Yamal peninsula. The Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2017, no. 3 (27), ðð. 4—17. (In Russian).

11. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Kargina T. N., Nikonov R. A. Digital technologies for remote detection and monitoring of the development of heaving mounds and craters of catastrophic gas blowouts in the Arctic. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2020, no. 4 (40), pp. 90—105. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2020-4-90-105. (In Russian)

12. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Kargina T. N. Catastrophic gas blowout in 2020 on the Yamal Peninsula in the Arctic. Results of comprehensive analysis of aerospace RS data. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 362—374. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2021-3-362-374. (In Russian).

13. Bogoyavlensky V., Bogoyavlensky I., Nikonov R. et al. Seyakha catastrophic blowout and explosion of gas from the permafrost in the Arctic, Yamal Peninsula. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2022, vol. 196, p. 103507. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103507.

14. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Nikonov R. A., Kargina T. N. Monitoring of the Mordyyakha gas explosion object development on Yamal on the basis of Earth remote sensing data. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 513—523. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2022-4-513-523. (In Russian).

15. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Nikonov R. A. Development monitoring of the C22 gas blowout Doublet object on Yamal peninsula using remote sensing data. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2024, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 320—333. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2024-3-320-333. (In Russian).

16. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Nikonov R. A., Gavrilov A. A. Anomalous rapid growth and explosion of the C23 Yamal gas-dynamic heaving mound in 2020—2024. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2025, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 4—17. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2025-3-4-17. (In Russian).

17. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Kishankov A. V. Geophysical methods of ensuring technological sovereignty and national security of Russia in the Arctic. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 32—46. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587324100055.

18. Epov M. I., Eltsov I. N., Potapov V. V. et al. Bermuda Triangle of Yamal. First-hand Science, 2014, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 14—23. (In Russian).

19. Olenchenko V. V., Sinitsky A. I., Antonov E. Yu. et al. Results of geophysical researches of the area of new geological formation “Yamal Crater”. Earth’s Cryosphere, 2015, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 94—106. (In Russian).

20. Badu Yu. B. Cryogenic Strata of Gas-Bearing Structures in Yamal. On the Influence of Gas Deposits on the Formation and Development of Cryogenic Strata. Moscow, Scientific world, 2018, 232 p. (In Russian).

21. Leibman M. O., Kizyakov A. I., Plekhanov A. V., Streletskaya I. D. New permafrost feature — deep crater in Central Yamal, West Siberia, Russia, as a response to local climate fluctuations. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 2014, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 68—79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2014-7-4-68-79.

22. Kizyakov A., Leibman M., Zimin M. et al. Gas emission craters and mound-predecessors in the North of West Siberia, similarities and differences. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12, 2182. DOI: 10.3390/rs12142182.

23. Chuvilin E. M., Sokolova N. S., Bukhanov B. A. et al. Formation of Gas-Emission Craters in Northern West Siberia: Shallow Controls. Geosciences, 2021, 11, 393. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11090393.

24. Zolkos S., Fiske G., Windholz T. et al. Detecting and Mapping Gas Emission Craters on the Yamal and Gydan Peninsulas, Western Siberia. Geosciences, 2021, 11, 21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11010021.

25. Schurmeier L. R., Brouwer G. E., Fagents S. A. Formation of the Siberian Yamal gas emission crater via accumulation and explosive release of gas within permafrost. Permafrost and Periglac Process, 2023, vol. 35, pp. 33—45. DOI: 10.1002/ppp.2211.

26. Hellevang H., Ippach M. R., Westermann S., Nooraiepour M. Formation of giant Siberian gas emission craters (GECs). Science of The Total Environment, 2025, vol. 995, 180042. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180042.

27. Skorobogatov V. A., Stroganov L. V., Kopeev V. D. Geological structure and gas and oil content of Yamal. Moscow, LLC “Nedra-Business Center”, 2003, 352 p. (In Russian).

28. Brekhuntsov A. M., Monastyrev B. V., Nesterov I. I., Skorobogatov V. A. Oil and gas geology of the West Siberian Arctic. Tyumen, ÎÎÎ MNP Geodata, 2020, 464 p. (In Russian).

29. Yakushev V. S. Natural Gas and Gas Hydrates in Cryolithozone. Moscow, VNIIGAZ, 2009, 192 p. (In Russian).

30. Badu Yu. B., Trofimov V. T., Vasilchuk Yu. K. Basic patterns of distribution and types of stratal deposits of underground ice in the northern part of the West Siberian Plate. Formative ice of the permafrost zone. Yakutsk, IM SO AN USSR, 1982, pp. 13—24. (In Russian).

31. Kritsuk L. N. Ground ice of Western Siberia. Moscow, Scientific world, 2010, 352 p. (In Russian).

32. Cryosphere of oil and gas condensate fields of the Yamal Peninsula: Monograph in 3 volumes. Vol. 2. Cryosphere of the Bovanenkovo oil and condensate field. Under the general direction. Eds. Yu. B. Badu, N. A. Gafarov, E. E. Podborny. Moscow, Gazprom Expo LLC, 2013, 421 p. (In Russian).

33. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Nikonov R. A. Explosive degassing of the Earth in the north of Western Siberia: land and coastal parts of the Kara Sea. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2025, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 162—176. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2025-2-162-176. (In Russian).

34. Porter C., Howat I., Noh M.-J. et al. ArcticDEM — Strips, Version 4.1. 2022, Harvard Dataverse, V1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/C98DVS.

35. Porter C., Howat I., Noh M.-J. et al. ArcticDEM — Mosaics, Version 4.1. 2023, Harvard Dataverse, V1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/3VDC4W.

36. Quadcopter DJI Mavic Pro Platinum. Available at: https://www.geo-spektr.ru/bespilotnye-letatelnye-apparaty/kvadrokoptery/dji/DJI-Mavic-Pro-Platinum.html.

37. Agisoft Metashape User Manual Professional Edition, Version 2.0. Agisoft LLC, 2023, 253 p. Available at: https://www.agisoft.com/pdf/metashape-pro_2_0_ru.pdf.

38. PIX4Dmapper. The leading photogrammetry software for professional drone mapping. Available at: https://www.pix4d.com/product/pix4dmapper-photogrammetry-software/.

39. ArcGIS. Ãåîïðîñòðàíñòâåííàÿ ïëàòôîðìà ESRI êîðïîðàòèâíîãî óðîâíÿ. — URL: https://www.esri.com/ru-ru/arcgis/geospatial-platform/overview.

ArcGIS. ESRI’s enterprise-grade geospatial platform. Available at: https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/geospatial-platform/overview.

40. Mackay J. R. Growth of Ibyuk Pingo, Western Arctic Coast, Canada, and some implications for environmental reconstructions. Quaternary Research, 1986, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 68—80.

41. Mackay J. R. Pingo Growth and collapse, Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula Area, Western Arctic Coast, Canada: a long-term field study. Géographie physique et Quaternaire, 1998, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1—53.


Download »


© 2011-2026 Arctic: ecology and economy
DOI 10.25283/2223-4594