 |
ISSN 2223-4594 | ISSN 2949-110X
|
Advanced Search
RuEn
|
 |
ABOUT|EDITORIAL|INFO|ARCHIVE|FOR AUTHORS|SUBSCRIBE|CONTACTS |  |
STUDY OF GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY IMPACT ON FUNCTIONING OF RAILWAY AUTOMATICS IN RUSSIAN ARCTIC
JOURNAL: Volume 13, No. 3, 2023, p. 341-352HEADING: Research activities in the Arctic
AUTHORS: Yagova, N.V., Rozenberg, I.N., Gvishiani, A.D., Sakharov, Y.A., Garanin, S.L., Voronin, V.A., Pilipenko, V.A., Dubchak, I.A.
ORGANIZATIONS: Polar Geophysical Institute of the Kola Scientific Center of RAS , Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry of Russian Academó of Sciences, Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian University of Transport, Geophysical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Research and project Institute of railway transport informatics, automatics and communication systems
DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2023-3-341-352
UDC: 550.385
The article was received on: 06.01.2023
Keywords: space weather, geomagnetic disturbances, railways
Bibliographic description: Yagova, N.V., Rozenberg, I.N., Gvishiani, A.D., Sakharov, Y.A., Garanin, S.L., Voronin, V.A., Pilipenko, V.A., Dubchak, I.A. Study of geomagnetic activity impact on functioning of railway automatics in Russian Arctic. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 341-352. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2023-3-341-352. (In Russian).
Abstract:
The authors study the possible influence of geomagnetic activity of railway automatics in the Russian Arctic. For the analysis they use the indices of global and regional geomagnetic activity along with the archive of failures on the Northern section of the Oktyabrskaya railway in 2001—2006. The geomagnetic activity is found to be higher for days with failures than for days without the ones. This effect manifests itself in different types of geomagnetic disturbances, including magnetic storms, characterized by the storm index Dst, auroral activations, quantified in AE and EI indices, as well as in local index WY indicating spectral power of geomagnetic variations in milliHerz frequency range. The maximum differences for days with and without failures are obtained for index values averaged over 2—4 days. At the same time, the researchers have found no significant differences between failures for which a cause not related to geomagnetic disturbance is a priori indicated, and those for which such a cause is not identified.
Finance info: The study was supported by the RSCF grant No. 21-77-30010
References:
1. Pilipenko V. A. Space weather impact on ground-based technological systems. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2021, vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 68—104.
2. Love J. J., Hayakawa H., Cliver E. W. Intensity and impact of the New York Railroad superstorm of May 1921. Space Weather, 2019, vol. 17, pp. 1281—1292. DOI: 10.1029/2019SW002250.
3. Wik M., Pirjola R., Lundstedt H. et al. Space weather events in July 1982 and October 2003 and the effects of geomagnetically induced currents on Swedish technical systems. Ann. Geophys., 2009, vol. 27, iss. 4, pp. 1775—1787.
4. Kostrominov A. M., Lozhkin R. O. Influence of geoinduced currents on impedance bonds with secondary windings used in railway automation circuits. Izvetiya Peterburgskogo Universiteta putey soobshcheniya, 2021, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 222—228. DOI: 10.20295/1815-588X-2021-2-222-228. (In Russian).
5. Eroshenko E. A., Belov A. V., Boteler D., Gaidash S. P., Lobkov S. L., Pirjola R., Trichtchenko L. Effects of strong geomagnetic storms on Northern railways in Russia. Advances in Space Research, 2010, vol. 46, pp. 1102—1110. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2010.05.017.
6. Vorob’ev A. V., Pilipenko V. A., Sakharov Ya. A., Selivanov V. N. Statistical relationships between variations of the geomagnetic filed, auroral electrojet and geomagnetically induced currents. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2019, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 35—42.
7. Sakharov Ya., Kudryashova N., Danilin A. et al. Influence of geomagnetic disturbances on railway automatics. Vestnik MITE (MIIT), 2009, iss. 21, pp. 107—111. (In Russian).
8. Kasinskii V. V., Lyakhov N. N., Ptitsyna N. G., Tyasto M. I., Villoresi G., Iucci N. Effect of geomagnetic disturbances on the operation of railroad automated mechanisms and telemechanics. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2007, vol. 47, iss. 5, pp. 676—680.
9. Rozenberg I. N., Gvoshiani A. D., Solov’ev A. A., Voronin V. A., Pilipenko V. A. Influence of space weather on stability of railway transport system in Russian Arctics. Zheleznodorozhnyi transport, 2021, iss. 12, pp. 20—26. (In Russian).
10. Sakharov Ya., Katkalov Yu., Kudryashova N., Danilin A., Shabalin A., Pirjola R., Viljanen A.. Effects of geomagnetic disturbances on Oktyabrskaya railway in Russia. Seventh European Space Weather Week 15—19 November, 2010. Brugge, Belgium, 2010. Available at: https://www.sidc.be/esww7/program/poster1.php.
11. Lyons L. R. A new theory for magnetospheric substorms. J. Geophys. Res., 1995, vol. 100, pp. 19069—19081.
12. Apatenkov S. V., Pilipenko V. A., Gordeev E. I. et al. Auroral omega bands are a significant cause of large geomagnetically induced currents. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2020, vol. 47, p. e2019GL086677. DOI: 10.1029/2019GL086677.
13. Belakhovsky V., Pilipenko V., Engebretson M., Sakharov Ya., Selivanov V. Impulsive disturbances of the geomagnetic field as a cause of induced currents of electric power lines. J. of Space Weather and Space Climate, 2019, vol. 9, A18. DOI: 10.1051/swsc/2019015.
14. Tanskanen E. I. A comprehensive high-throughput analysis of substorms observed by IMAGE magnetometer network: Years 1993—2003 examined. J. Geophys. Res., 2009, vol. 114, p. A05204.
15. Sakharov Y. A., Yagova N. V., Pilipenko V. A. Pc5/Pi3 Geomagnetic Pulsations and Geomagnetically Induced Currents. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys., 2021, vol. 85, pp. 329—333. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873821030217.
16. Yagova N. V., Fedorov E. N., Pilipenko V. A., Lhamdondog A. D., Gusev Y. P. Geomagnetically induced currents and space weather: Pi3 pulsations and extreme values of time derivatives of geomagnetic field horizontal components. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 2018, vol. 54, iss. 5, pp. 749—763.
17. Jenkins G., Watts D. Spectral analysis and its applications. San Francisco, London, Amsterdam, Holden-Day, 1969, 525 p.
18. Pilipenko V. A., Kozyreva O. V., Engebretson M. J., Soloviev A. A. ULF wave power index for the space weather and geophysical applications: A review. Russ. J. Earth Science, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 2, p. ES1004. DOI: 10.2205/2017ES000597.
19. Sheffe H. The analysis of variance. New York, Chapman and Hall, 1959, 477 p.
20. Kobzar A. I. Applied mathematical statistics. Moscow, Fizmatlit, 2006, 816 p. (In Russian).
21. Brunner E., Munzel U. The nonparametric Benhrens-Fisher problem: Asymptotic theory and a small-sample approximation. Biometrical J., 2000, vol. 42, pp. 17—25. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(200001).
22. Vovk V. Ya., Egorova L. V., Troshichev O. A. Relation between the atmospheric characteristics in the antarctic regions and the space weather factors. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2008, vol. 48, iss. 4, pp. 536—541.
23. Kasatkina E. A., Shumilov O. I., Novikova T. B., Khramov A. V. Features of suicide dynamics and cyclicity and heliospheric and antropogenic factors in Kola North. Ekologiya Cheloveka, 2014, iss. 2, pp. 45—50. (In Russian).
24. Milan S. E. Both solar wind-magnetosphere coupling and ring current intensity control of the size of the auroral oval. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2009, vol. 36, L18101.
25. Yagova N. V., Pilipenko V. A., Sakharov Ya. A., Selivanov V. A. Spatial scale of geomagnetic Pc5/Pi3 pulsations as a factor of their efficiency in generation of geomagnetically induced currents. Earth, Planets and Space, 2021, vol. 73, p. 88. DOI: 10.1186/s40623-021-01407-2.
26. Belov A. V., Gaidash S. P., Kanonidi Kh. D., Kanonidi K. Kh., Kuznetsov V. D., Eroshenko E. A. Operative center of the geophysical prognosis in IZMIRAN. Annales of Geophysicae, 2005, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 3163—3170. DOI: SRef-ID:1432-0576/ag/2005-23-3163.
Download »