THE COASTAL TERRITORIES OF THE ARKHANGELSK REGION: THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Coastal communities on the shores of the White Sea were formed during the period of active use of the territory natural resources. Sea animal catching, fishing and livestock farming provided income and welfare for local communities. Analysis of the use of natural resources and socio-economic development of coastal areas are the objectives of the study. The researcher considers the stages of the use of the territory natural resources and changes in local communities. Currently, the economic development of the territory has a zonal character. The remoteness of the main consumers and the inaccessibility of the use of natural resources are the reasons for this model of economic activity. In the main part of coastal settlements, there is a strong migration outflow of the able-bodied population. Only some settlements have positive development trends. However, new drivers for the territory development appeared: industrial development of the diamond deposit and the laying of the road, providing almost year-round communication with the regional center.

1. Druzhinin P. V., Potasheva O. V. Rol’ innovatsii v razvitii ekonomiki severnykh i arkticheskikh territorii. [The role of innovation in the economic development of the Northern and Arctic regions]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika, 2019, no. 3 (35), pp. 4—15. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2019-3-4-15. (In Russian).
2. Capello R. Space, growth and development. Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Ed. by R. Capello and P. Nijkamp. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2009, pp. 33—52.
3. Champalle C., Ford J. D., Sherman M. Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptations in Canadian Arctic Communities. Sustainability, 2015, vol. 7, pp. 9268—9292. DOI:10.3390/su7079268.
4. Stepan’ko N. G. Struktura prirodopol’zovaniya na arkticheskikh territoriyakh rossiiskogo Dal’nego Vostoka. [The structure of nature management in the Arctic territories of the Russian Far East]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika, 2019, no. 2 (34), pp. 18—30. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2019-2-18-30. (In Russian).
5. Fadeeva O. P. Prigranichnye sel’skie territorii Zabaikal’ya: razvitie ili degradatsiya? (zametki sotsiologa). [Trans-Baikal border rural areas: development or degradation? (notes of a sociologist)]. EKO, 2014, no. 11 (485), S. 36—54. (In Russian).
6. Gubina O. V., Provorova A. A. Sovremennye podkhody k khozyaistvennomu osvoeniyu arkticheskikh territorii RF v aspekte perspektivnogo prostranstvennogo razvitiya. [Modern approaches to the economic development of the Arctic territories of the Russian Federation in the aspect of perspective spatial development]. Fundament. issled, 2018, no. 11-1, pp. 46—51. (In Russian).
7. Connell J. Islands: Balancing development and sustainability? Environmental Conservation, 2018, vol. 45 (2), pp. 111—124. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892918000036.
8. Baldacchino G. Insularite et developpement durable, La corse et le developpement durable and Le Quebec des iles [Review of the book, by F. Taglioni, M. A. Maupertuis and L. Guay]. Island Studies J., 2013, Vol. 8 (1), pp. 191—193.
9. Conrad E., Cassar L. F. Decoupling Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: Reviewing Progress to Date in the Small Island State of Malta. Sustainability, 2014, vol. 6, pp. 6729—6750. DOI: 10.3390/su6106729.
10. Jørgensen S. E., Nielsen S. N. A carbon cycling model developed for the renewable Energy Danish Island, Samsø. Ecological Modelling, 2015, vol. 306, pp. 106—120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.004.
11. Petrosillo I., Costanza R., Aretano R., Zaccarelli N., Zurlini G. The use of subjective indicators to assess how natural and social capital support residents’ quality of life in a small volcanic island. Ecological Indicators, 2013, vol. 24, pp. 609—620. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.021.
12. Banos-Gonzalez I., Martinez-Fernandez J., Esteve M. Tools for sustainability assessment in island socio-ecological systems: An application to the Canary Islands. Island Studies J., 2016, vol. 11 (6), pp. 9—34.
13. Okladnikov N. A. Mezenskie derevni: Istoricheskie ocherki. [Mezen villages. Historical essays]. Arkhangel’sk, OAO “IPP “Pravda Severa”, 2012, 370 p. (In Russian).
14. Shchelkov K. P. Issledovaniya o sostoyanii rybolovstva v Rossii. T. 6. Rybnye i zverinye promysly na Belom i Ledovitom moryakh. [Research on the state of fisheries in Russia: Vol. 6. Fisheries and animals in the White and Arctic Seas]. Moscow, Kniga po trebovaniyu, 2014, 270 p. (In Russian).
15. Gagieva A. K. Istoriya osvoeniya severnykh territorii evropeiskogo Severa vo vtoroi polovine XVIII — pervoi polovine XIX vv. v usloviyakh modernizatsii strany. [The history of the development of the northern territories of the European North in the second half of the XVIII — the first half of the XIX centuries. in the context of modernization of the country]. Wschodnioeuropejskie Czasopismo Naukowe, 2016, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 30—34. (In Russian).
16. Promysel morskogo zverya v Belom more i Ledovitom okeane. [Catch of marine mammals in the White Sea and the Arctic Ocean]. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. Leningrad, Moscow, Snabtekhizdat, 1932, 92 p. (In Russian).
17. Konstantinov A. S. Transformatsiya territorial’no-poselencheskoi struktury kak faktor izmeneniya chislennosti sel’skogo naseleniya v Arkhangel’skoi oblasti. [The transformation of the territorial-settlement structure as a factor in changing the number of rural population in the Arkhangelsk region]. Arktika i Sever, 2013, no. 13, pp. 136—149. (In Russian).
18. Preminina Ya. K. Sovremennyi demograficheskii krizis v Arkhangel’skoi oblasti. [The modern demographic crisis in the Arkhangelsk region]. Vestn. Pomor. un-ta. Ser. Estestv. nauki, 2010, no. 4, pp. 20—26. (In Russian).
19. Gubina O. V., Provorova A. A. Sootnoshenie demograficheskikh i innovatsionnykh prioritetov strategicheskogo razvitiya regionov Arkticheskoi zony Rossiiskoi Federatsii. [Correlation of demographic and innovative priorities of strategic development of the regions of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation]. Vopr. innovats. ekonomiki, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 383—400. (In Russian).
20. Grigorash O. F. Almazy Arkhangel’skoi oblasti. [Diamonds of the Arkhangelsk region]. Gos. audit. Pravo. Ekonomika, 2017, no. 1, pp. 88—91. (In Russian).
21. Dale B., Bay-Larsen I., Skorstad B. The Will to Drill. Revisiting Arctic Communities // The Will to Drill — Mining in Arctic Communites. B. Dale, I. Bay-Larsen, B. Skorstad (eds). [S. l.], Springer Polar Sciences, 2018, pp. 213—228. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_11.
22. Chen A., Natcher D. Greening Canada’s Arctic food system: Local food procurement strategies for combating food insecurity. Canadian Food Studies / La Revue Canadienne Des études Sur L’alimentation, 2019, vol. 6 (1), pp. 140—154. DOI: 10.15353/cfs-rcea.v6i1.301.
23. Podoplekin A. O. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskoe samochuvstvie sel’skogo naseleniya pribrezhnoi zony Belomor’ya kak faktor riska dlya arkticheskoi politiki Rossii. [Socio-psychological well-being of the rural population of the White Sea coastal zone as a risk factor for the Arctic policy of Russia]. Arktika i Sever, 2016, no. 24, pp. 27—38. (In Russian).
24. Tortsev A. M. Mekhanizm gosudarstvennogo upravleniya promyshlennym rybolovstvom v presnovodnykh vodnykh ob”ektakh (na primere Arkhangel’skoi oblasti). [The mechanism of state management of industrial fisheries in freshwater bodies (on the example of the Arkhangelsk region)]. Vestn. Murman. gos. tekhnich. un-ta, 2016, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 536—542. (In Russian).
25. Podoplekin A. O. Sel’skie zhiteli pribrezhnykh territorii arkhangel’skoi oblasti: “dozhivayushchee naselenie” ili resurs razvitiya rossiiskoi Arktiki? [Rural residents of the coastal territories of the Arkhangelsk region: “surviving population” or a resource for the development of the Russian Arctic?]. Vestn. Ros. gumanitar. nauch. fonda, 2016, no. 2 (83), pp. 213—222. (In Russian).
26. Christensen J., Arnfjord S., Carraher S., Hedwig T. Homelessness across Alaska, the Canadian North and Greenland: A Review of the Literature on a Developing Social Phenomenon in the Circumpolar North. Arctic, 2017, vol. 70 (4), pp. 349—364. DOI: 10.14430/arctic4680.
27. Ford J. D., Clark D., Pearce T. et al. Changing access to ice, land and water in Arctic communities. Nature Climate Change, 2019, vol. 9, pp. 335—339. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-019-0435-7.
28. Bell T., Brown T. M. From Science to Policy in the Eastern Canadian Arctic: An Integrated Regional Impact Study (IRIS) of Climate Change and Moderization. Quebec City: ArcticNet, 2018, 560 p.
29. Blakkisrud H. Governing the Arctic: The Russian State Commission for Arctic Development and the Forging of a New Domestic Arctic Policy Agenda. Arctic Rev. on Law and Politics, 2019, vol. 10, pp. 190—216. DOI: 10.23865/arctic.v10.1929.
30. Dvoryadkina E. B., Belousova E. A. Luchshie praktiki prostranstvennogo razvitiya: vozmozhnost’ adaptatsii v otnoshenii munitsipal’nykh raionov. [Best Practices of Spatial Development: Possibility of Using Them in the Municipal Districts of Russia]. Regionologiya, 2019, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 633—660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.109.027.201904.633-660. (In Russian).