Arctic: ecology and economy
ISSN 2223-4594
Home Archive of journals Issue 2(38) 2020 Socio-economic development of coastal municipal areas of the White Sea region


JOURNAL: 2020, 2(38), p. 97-108

HEADING: Regional problems

AUTHORS: Kurilo A.E., Druzhinin P.V., Shkiperova G.T., Prokopiev Y.A.

ORGANIZATIONS: Institute of Economics of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2020-2-97-108

UDC: 332.122(210)(470.22)

The article was received on: 20.02.2020

Keywords: White sea, Russian Arctic zone, municipal districts, coastal territories, blue economy

Bibliographic description: Kurilo A.E., Druzhinin P.V., Shkiperova G.T., Prokopiev Y.A. Socio-economic development of coastal municipal areas of the White Sea region. Arctic: ecology and economy, 2020, no. 2(38), pp. 97-108. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2020-2-97-108. (In Russian).


The article presents the analysis results of socio-economic development of the White Sea coastal municipalities from the standpoint of sustainable development and in the context of blue economy. The White Sea coastal municipal areas enter different subjects of the North-West Federal District of Russia and belong to the Russian Arctic zone.
The subject of the study is socio-economic processes taking place in the White Sea coastal municipalities. The aim of this work is to identify trends in socio-ecological and economic development of the White Sea coastal municipal areas in the context of blue growth and to elaborate recommendations for the formation an inclusive management system for their development.
The statistical data published by the Federal State Statistic Service (Rosstat) and reflecting the development of municipalities in the three interrelated areas of sustainable development are analyzed. The destructive tendencies occurring in the social, economic and environmental sphere of coastal territories are reveled and described: depopulation, decrease in economic activity, and environmental load. Models are developed that reflect migration processes taking place in coastal municipal formations within the period 1989—2017.
The economic development of coastal municipal formations is associated with the availability and accessibility of natural resources. In some municipal districts, the main types of economic activity are those related to the livelihoods of the population. There is a decrease in quality of economic space due to a reduction in the number of working-age people. The digital space of coastal settlements is forming slowly. Against the background of destructive processes in economic sphere, the eco-intensity of emissions decreases.
The authors propose recommendations on shaping of a regular institutional environment and overcoming depopulation processes, and suggest directions for the economy diversification of coastal territories. The authors consider it necessary to strengthen inter-municipal cooperation and coordination of management decisions for achieving sustainable development goals in the White Sea region.
The realization of the long-term potential of the blue economy in the sphere of employment, economic activity and environmental responsibility is possible if socio-ecological and economic aspects of managing the White Sea region are coordinated and the authorities at all government levels work systematically along the direction.

Finance info: The research is done in the framework of the RFBR grant No. 18-05-60296 Fundamental problems of the natural and social environment of the White Sea and the catchment area: the state and possible changes under different scenarios of climate and economic changes.


1. Eustachio J. H., Caldana A. C., Liboni L. B., Martinelli D. P. Systemic indicator of sustainable development: Proposal and application of a framework. J. of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 241. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118383.

2. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/2030_Agenda_en.pdf.

3. Eikeset A. M., Mazzarella A. B., Davíðsdóttir B., Klinger D. H., Levin S. A., Rovenskay E., Stenseth N. Ch. What is blue growth? The semantics of “Sustainable Development” of marine environments. Marine Policy, 2018, vol. 87, pp. 177—179. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.019.

4. Report on the Blue Growth Strategy: towards More Sustainable Growth and Jobs in the Blue Economy. European Commission. [S. l.], 2017, 61 . Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/maritimeaffairs/policy/blue_growth_en.

5. The Potential of the Blue Economy: Increasing Long-Term Benefits of the Sustainable Use of Marine Resources for Small Island Developing States and Coastal Least Developed Countries. The World Bank. [S. l.], 2017, 38 . Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/26843/115545.pdf?se.

6. Roberts C., O’Leary B., McCauley D., Cury P. M., Duarte C., Lubchenco J., Pauly D., Sáenz-Arroyo A., Sumaila R., Wilson R., Worm B., Castilla J. Marine reserves can mitigate and promote adaptation to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, vol. 114, no. 24, pp. 6167—6175. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701262114.

7. Littles C. J., Jackson C. A., DeWitt T. H., Harwell M. C. Linking people to coastal habitats: A meta-analysis of final ecosystem goods and services on the coast. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2018, vol. 165, pp. 356—369. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.09.009.

8. Pérez E. C., Yaneva Z. V. The European Arctic policy in progress. Polar Science, 2016, vol. 10, iss. 3, pp. 441—449. DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2016.06.008.

9. Kim H. J. Success in heading north? South Korea’s master plan for Arctic policy. Marine Policy, 2015, vol. 61, pp. 264—272. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.08.002.

10. Kurta I., Zemlyansky V. Preconditions for Technological Development of the Construction Industry of the North for the Arrangement of the Mineral Complex of the Russian Arctic. Procedia Engineering, 2016, vol. 165, P. 1542—1546. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.891.

11. Ferro-Azcona H., Espinoza-Tenorio A., Calderón-Contreras R., Ramenzoni V. C., País M. M., Mesa-Jurado M. A. Adaptive capacity and social-ecological resilience of coastal areas: A systematic review. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2019, vol. 173, pp. 36—51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.005.

12. Lipina S. A. Innovacionnyj vektor razvitiya pribrezhnyh territorij Rossijskoj Arktiki. [Innovative vector of development of coastal territories of the Russian Arctic]. Arktika i Sever, 2016, no. 22, pp. 66—74. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2016.22.66. (In Russian).

13. Emel’yanova E. E. Sistemnye problemy i napravleniya razvitiya municipalitetov rossijskoj Arktiki. [System problems and directions of development of municipalities of the Russian Arctic]. Arktika i Sever, 2019, no. 35, pp. 79—93. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2019.35.79. (In Russian).

14. Ivanova M. V., Kaspar’yan Zh. E. Nekotorye aspekty social’noj politiki v arkticheskoj zone Rossijskoj Federacii. [Some aspects of social policy in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation]. Sever i rynok, 2017, no. 3, pp. 97—108. (In Russian).

15. Toropushina E. E. Metodicheskie podhody k ocenke urovnya razvitiya social’noj infrastruktury regionov Severa i Arktiki Rossii. [Methodological approaches to assessing the level of development of social infrastructure in the regions of the North and the Arctic of Russia]. Sever i rynok, 2018, no. 4, pp. 101—110. (In Russian).

16. Stepanova E. N. Korennye malochislennye narody Severa v usloviyah aktivnoj promyshlennoj deyatel’nosti v severnyh i arkticheskih regionah Rossii. [Indigenous peoples of the North in the conditions of active industrial activity in the Northern and Arctic regions of Russia]. Sever i rynok, 2018, no. 4, pp. 122—132. (In Russian).

17. Druzhinin P. V., Zimin D. A. Vliyanie vneshnih shokov na prostranstvennuyu strukturu naseleniya prigranichnyh territorij. [Influence of external shocks on the spatial structure of the populations of border areas]. Vestn. SPbGU. Ekonomika, 2018, vol. 35, iss. 3, pp. 397—418. DOI: 10.21638/spbu05.2019.304. (In Russian).

18. Fauzer V. V., Smirnov A. V. Mirovaya Arktika: prirodnye resursy, rasselenie naseleniya, ekonomika. [World Arctic: natural resources, population settlement, economy]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika, 2018, no. 3 (31), pp. 3—22. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2018-3-6-22. (In Russian).

19. Prokop’ev E. A., Kurilo A. E., Gubina O. V. The formation of digital space at the municipal level: overview of settlements’ websites. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2019, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 76—90. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.5.65.5.

20. Kuratova L. A. Vliyanie informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologii na effektivnost’ ekonomiki severnykh regionov Rossii. [Influence of information and communication technologies on the efficiency of the economy of the Northern regions of Russia]. Sever i rynok, 2016, no. 4 (51), pp. 150—161. (In Russian).

21. Tolstikov A. V., Chernov I. A. Antropogennoe vozdejstvie na ekologicheskoe sostoyanie Belogo morya. [Anthropogenic impact on the ecological state of the White sea]. Nauch.-issled. publikacii, 2014, no. 15 (19), pp. 19—31. (In Russian).

22. Tishkov A. A., Belonovskaya E. A., Glazov P. M., Krenke A. N., Titova S. V., Tsarevskaya N. G., Shmatova A. G. Antropogennaya transformaciya arkticheskih ekosistem Rossii: podhody, metody, ocenki. [Anthropogenic transformation of Russia’s Arctic ecosystems: approaches, methods, and assessments]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika, 2019, no. 4 (36), pp. 38—51. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2019-4-38-51. (In Russian)

23. Dvorcova E. N. Pravovaya podderzhka ekonomicheskogo razvitiya pribrezhnyh territorij Rossii. [Legal support for economic development of Russian coastal territories]. Problemy sovrem. ekonomiki, 2012, no. 1 (41), pp. 237—240. (In Russian).

24. Pchel’nikov M. V. Mestnoe soobshchestvo kak politicheskij aktor v formirovanii ekologicheskogo upravleniya pribrezhnymi territoriyami i sopredel’nymi rajonami. [Local community as a political actor in the formation of environmental management of coastal territories and adjacent areas]. Sovremennye tendencii social’nogo, ekonomicheskogo i pravovogo razvitiya stran Evrazii. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Moscow, 2016, pp. 584—589. (In Russian).

25. Krashevskaya A. A., Fedorova O. A. K voprosu kompleksnogo upravleniya pribrezhnoj zonoj Kol’skogo zaliva. [On the issue of integrated management of the coastal zone of the Kola Bay]. Izv. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenij. Arktich. region, 2016, no. 1, pp. 18—23. (In Russian).

26. Podoplyokin A. O. Social’no-psihologicheskoe samochuvstvie sel’skogo naseleniya pribrezhnoj zony Belomor’ya kak faktor riska dlya arkticheskoj politiki Rossii. [Social and psychological well-being of the rural population of the coastal zone of the white sea region as a risk factor for the Arctic policy of Russia]. Arktika i Sever, 2016, no. 24, pp. 27—38. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2016.24.27. (In Russian).

27. Zhuravleva I. V., Sharahmatova V. N. Razrabotka koncepcii social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya soobshchestv mestnogo naseleniya pribrezhnyh territorij zapadnoj Kamchatki. [Development of the concept of social and economic development of local communities in the coastal territories of Western Kamchatka]. Vest. Kamchat. gos. tekhn. un-ta, 2009, no. 8, pp. 24—33. (In Russian).

28. Ahobadze D. T. Pribrezhnye territorii severo-zapada Rossii kak prioritetnye zony turistsko-rekreacionnogo razvitiya. [Coastal territories of the North-West of Russia as priority zones of tourist and recreational development]. Strategiya ustojchivogo razvitiya regionov Rossii, 2015, no. 28, pp. 104—108. (In Russian).

29. Dawson J., Johnston M., Stewart E. The unintended consequences of regulatory complexity: The case of cruise tourism in Arctic Canada. Marine Policy, 2017, vol. 76, pp. 71—78. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.11.002.

30. Aanesen M., Andersson J. F., Vondolia G. K., Borch T., Navrud S., Tinch D. Valuing coastal recreation and the visual intrusion from commercial activities in Arctic Norway Ocean & Coastal Management, 2018, vol. 153, pp. 157—167. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.12.017.

Download »

© 2011-2020 Arctic: ecology and economy
DOI 10.25283/2223-4594