Home » Archive of journals » Volume 11, No. 3, 2021 » Catastrophic gas blowout in 2020 on the Yamal Peninsula in the Arctic. Results of comprehensive analysis of aerospace RS data
CATASTROPHIC GAS BLOWOUT IN 2020 ON THE YAMAL PENINSULA IN THE ARCTIC. RESULTS OF COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF AEROSPACE RS DATAJOURNAL: Volume 11, No. 3, 2021, p. 362-374
HEADING: Research activities in the Arctic
AUTHORS: Bogoyavlensky, V.I., Bogoyavlensky, I.V., Kargina, T.N.
ORGANIZATIONS: Oil and Gas Research Institute of RAS, Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University)
UDC: 502.171, 504.4, 504.7
The article was received on: 22.06.2021
Keywords: gas blowout (emission), remote sensing of the Earth, crater, permafrost, underground ice, perennial heaving mound (PHM), pingo, cavity, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), digital elevation model (DEM), ArcticDEM
Bibliographic description: Bogoyavlensky, V.I., Bogoyavlensky, I.V., Kargina, T.N. Catastrophic gas blowout in 2020 on the Yamal Peninsula in the Arctic. Results of comprehensive analysis of aerospace RS data. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 362-374. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2021-3-362-374. (In Russian).
The researchers carried out comprehensive study of the Bovanenkovo C17 object of a catastrophic gas blowout in 2020 based on RS data from space and using UAV. For the first time, based on the UAV data, they created a digital 3D model of a cavity in a ground ice massif, in which gas-dynamic processes developed. The dimensions of the cavity bottom are 14×61.5 m, and its height before the explosion was 25-30 m. The 3D model allows research in virtual space. According to RS data from space, the researchers have proved more than half a century of slow growth of the perennial heaving mound (PHM) C17 and established that its explosion occurred from May 28 to June 9. Based on the analysis of digital elevation models (DEM) ArcticDEM in the period of 2011-2017 they revealed an uneven growth rate of the PHM surface — on average 8 cm/year, maximum up to 20 cm/year. The scientists confirmed the formation features of gas-saturated cavities in the massifs of ground ice under the influence of endogenous processes, gas-dynamic growth of PHMs, powerful blowouts, self-ignitions and explosions of gas with the formation of giant craters. The results make it possible to reduce the risks of emergencies and catastrophic situations at the facilities of the oil and gas industry in the Arctic.
Finance info: The research was conducted according to the state assignment on the topic “Rational nature management and effective development of oil and gas resources of the Arctic and Sub-Arctic zones of the Earth” (No. ÀÀÀÀ-À19-119021590079-6).
1. Saunois M., Stavert A. R., Poulter B. et al. The Global Methane Budget 2000—2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 2020, 12, pp. 1561—1623. DOI: 10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020.
2. Are F. E. The problem of emission of deep gases into the atmosphere. Kriosfera Zemli, 1998, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 42—50. (In Russian).
3. Badu Yu. B. Cryogenic Strata of Gas-Bearing Structures in Yamal. On the Influence of Gas Deposits on the Formation and Development of Cryogenic Strata. Moscow, Nauch. mir, 2018, 232 p. (In Russian).
4. Bogoyavlensky V. I. Arctic and the World Ocean: Current State, Perspectives and Challenges of Hydrocarbon Production. Tr. Volnogo ekon. o-va, 2014, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 12—175. (In Russian).
5. Bogoyavlensky V. I. Natural and technogenic threats in fossil fuels production in the Earth cryolithosphere. Russian Mining Industry, 2020, pp. 97—118. DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2020-1-97-118. (In Russian).
6. Bogoyavlensky V. I. Fundamental aspects of the catastrophic gas blowout genesis and the formation of giant craters in the Arctic. Arktika: ekologiya i economika.[Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51—66. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2021-1-51-66. (In Russian).
7. Chuvilin E. M., Yakushev V. S., Perlova U. M., Kondakov V. V. Gas component of frozen rock strata within the Bovanenkovo gas condensate field (Yamal Peninsula). Dokl. RAN, 1999, 369 (4), pp. 522—524. (In Russian).
8. Yakushev V. S. Natural Gas and Gas Hydrates in Cryolithozone. Moscow, VNIIGAZ, 2009, 192 p. (In Russian).
9. Kruglikov N. M., Kuzin I. L. Outcrops of deep gas at the Urengoyskoye field. Structural geomorphology andneotectonics of Western Siberia in connection with oil and gas potential. Proc. ZapSibNIGNI, 1973, iss. 3, pp. 96—106. (In Russian).
10. Walter K. M., Zimov S., Chanton J. P., Verbyla D., Chapin III F. S. Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming. Nature, 2006, 443, pp. 71—75. DOI: 10.1038/nature05040.
11. Bondur V. G., Kuznetsova T. V. Detecting Gas Seeps in Arctic Water Areas Using Remote Sensing Data. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 2015, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1060—1072. DOI: 10.1134/S0001433815090066.
12. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Kargina T. N., Nikonov R. A., Sizov O. S. Earth degassing in the Artic: Remote and field studies of the thermokarst lakes gas eruption. Arktika: ekologiya i economika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2019, no. 2 (34), ðð. 31—47. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2019-2-31-47. (In Russian).
13. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Sizov O. S., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Nikonov R. A., Kargina T. N. Earth degassing in the Arctic: Comprehensive studies of the distribution of frost mounds and thermokarst lakes with gas blowout craters on the Yamal peninsula. Arktika: ekologiya i economika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2019, no. 4 (36), ðð. 52—68. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2019-4-52-68. (In Russian).
14. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Erokhin G. N., Nikonov R. A., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Bryksin V. M. Study of catastrophic gas blowout zones in the Arctic based on passive microseismic monitoring (on the example of Lake Otkrytiye). Arktika: ekologiya i economika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2020, no. 1 (37), ðð. 93—104. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2020-1-93-104. (In Russian).
15. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Yerokhin G. N., Nikonov R. A., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Bryksin V. M. Passive seismic monitoring study of the Earth degassing in the Arctic. EAGE, Geomodel 2020, Sep 2020, vol. 2020, pp. 1—5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202050102.
16. Bogoyavlensky V. I. The threat of catastrophic gas blowouts form the Arctic cryolithozone. Yamal craters. Oil and Drilling, 2014, no. 9, pp. 13—18. (In Russian).
17. Bogoyavlensky V. I. The threat of catastrophic gas blowouts form the Arctic cryolithozone. Yamal and Taymyr craters. Pt. 2. Oil and Drilling, 2014, no. 10, pp. 4—8. (In Russian).
18. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Sizov O. S., Mazharov A. V., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Nikonov R. A., Kishankov A. V., Kargina T. N. Earth degassing in the Arctic: Remote and field studies of the Seyakha catastrophic gas emission on the Yamal Peninsula. Arktika: ekologiya i economika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2019, no. 1 (33), ðð. 80— 105. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2019-1-88-105. (In Russian).
19. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Sizov O. S., Nikonov R. A., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Kargina T. N. Earth degassing in the Arctic: the genesis of natural and anthropogenic methane emissions. Arktika: ekologiya i economika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2020, no. 3 (39), pp. 6—22. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2020-3-6-22. (In Russian).
20. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Kargina T. N., Nikonov R. A. Digital technologies for remote detection and monitoring of the development of heaving mounds and craters of catastrophic gas blowouts in the Arctic. Arktika: ekologiya i economika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2020, no. 4 (40), ðð. 90— 105. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2020-4-90-105. (In Russian).
21. Bogoyavlensky V. Gas Blowouts on the Yamal and Gydan Peninsulas // GeoExPro [London], 2015, vol. 12,
no. 5, ðð. 74—78.
22. Bogoyavlensky V., Bogoyavlensky I., Nikonov R., Kishankov A. Complex of geophysical studies of the Seyakha catastrophic gas blowout crater on the Yamal Peninsula, Russian Arctic. Geosciences, 2020, 10, 215. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10060215.
23. Bogoyavlensky V., Bogoyavlensky I., Nikonov R., Kargina T., Chuvilin E., Bukhanov B., Umnikov A. New Catastrophic Gas Blowout and Giant Crater on the Yamal Peninsula in 2020: Results of the Expedition and Data Processing. Geosciences, 2021, 11, 71, p. 20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020071.
24. Leibman M. O., Kizyakov A. I., Plekhanov A. V., Streletskaya I. D. New permafrost feature—Deep crater in Central Yamal, West Siberia, Russia, as a response to local climate fluctuations. Geogr. Environ. Sustain., 2014, 7, pp. 68—80.
25. Kizyakov A., Khomutov A., Zimin M., Khairullin R., Babkina E., Dvornikov Y., Leibman M. Microrelief associated with gas emission craters: Remote-sensing and field-based study. Remote Sens., 2018, 10, 677.
26. Olenchenko V. V., Sinitsky A. I., Antonov E. Yu., Eltsov I. N., Kushnarenko O. N., Plotnikov A. E., Potapov V. V., Epov M. I. Results of geophysical studies of the territory of the geological formation “Yamal crater”. Kriosfera Zemli, 2015, vol. 19, no. 4, pð. 94—106. (In Russian).
27. Sizov O. S. Remote analysis of consequences of surface gas shows in the north of Western Siberia. Geomatika, 2015, no. 1, ðð. 53—68. (In Russian).
28. Chuvilin E., Sokolova N., Davletshina D., Bukhanov B. et al. Conceptual models of gas accumulation in the shallow permafrost of Northern West Siberia and conditions for explosive gas emissions. Geosciences, 2020, 10, 195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10050195.
29. Zolkos S., Fiske G., Windholz T., Duran G. et al. Detecting and Mapping Gas Emission Craters on the Yamal and Gydan Peninsulas, Western Siberia. Geosciences, 2021, 11, 21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11010021.
30. Mackay J. R. Pingo Growth and collapse, Tuktoyaktuk Peninsula Area, Western Arctic Coast, Canada: a long-term field study. Géographie physique et Quaternaire, 1998, vol. 52, no. 3, pð. 271—323.
31. Bogoyavlensky I. V. Perspectives of implementing remote methods for geoecological tasks with creating 3D models. Third International Conference on Geology of the Caspian Sea and Adjacent Areas (Baku, 2019), 2019, pp. 1—5. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201952014.
32. Bogoyavlensky I. V. Results of changes monitoring inthe Tula karst sinkhole based on remote sensing from an unmanned aerial vehicle. EAGE Geomodel 2020, 2020, ðð. 1—5. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202050100.
33. Agisoft Metashape User Manual Professional Edition, Version 1.6. Agisoft LLC, 2020, 172 p. Available at: www.agisoft.com/pdf/metashape-pro_1_6_en.pdf.
34. Porter C., Morin P., Howat I., Noh M., Bates B., Peterman K., Keesey S., Schlenk M., Gardiner J., Tomko K. et al. ArcticDEM. Harv. Dataverse 2018, 1. DOI: 10.7910/DVN/OHHUKH.
35. CORONA: America’s first satellite program. Ed. K. C. Ruffner. CIA. Washington, 1995. — 362 p.
36. Grosse G., Schirrmeister L., Kunitsky V. V., Hubberten H.-W. The Use of CORONA Images in Remote Sensing of Periglacial Geomorphology: An Illustration from the NE Siberian Coast. Permafrost and Periglac. Process, 2005, 16, pp. 163—172. DOI: 10.1002/ppp.509.
37. Bogoyavlensky V. I. Innovative Technologies and Results of Studying Processes of Natural and ManMade Degassing of the Earth in the Lithosphere-CryosphereHydrosphere-Atmosphere System. Third International Conference on Geology of the Caspian Sea and Adjacent Areas (Baku, 2019). 2019, ðð. 1—5. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201952015.
38. Skorobogatov V. A., Stroganov L. V., Kopeev V. D. Geological structure and gas and oil content of Yamal. Moscow, LLC “Nedra-Business Center”, 2003, 352 p.
© 2011-2021 Arctic: ecology and economy