Home JOURNAL HEADINGS Author Index SUBJECT INDEX INDEX OF ORGANIZATIONS Article Index
 
Arctic: ecology and economy
ISSN 2223-4594 | ISSN 2949-110X
Advanced
Search
RuEn
ABOUT|EDITORIAL|INFO|ARCHIVE|FOR AUTHORS|SUBSCRIBE|CONTACTS
Home » Archive of journals » Volume 16, No. 3, 2026 » Invasion in the White Sea: the first discovery of the American Copepod Eurytemora americana (Copepoda, Calanoida)

INVASION IN THE WHITE SEA: THE FIRST DISCOVERY OF THE AMERICAN COPEPOD EURYTEMORA AMERICANA (COPEPODA, CALANOIDA)

JOURNAL: Volume 16, No. 3, 2026, p. 466-474

HEADING: Regional problems

AUTHORS: Sukhikh, N.M., Usov, N.V.

ORGANIZATIONS: Zoological Institute of RAS

DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2026-3-466-474

UDC: 574.58

The article was received on: 26.02.2026

Keywords: resettlemen, White sea, zooplankton, Far North and the Arctic, invasions, invader species, Copepoda

Bibliographic description: Sukhikh, N.M., Usov, N.V. Invasion in the White Sea: the first discovery of the American Copepod Eurytemora americana (Copepoda, Calanoida). Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2026, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 466-474. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2026-3-466-474. (In Russian).


Abstract:

A new species Eurytemora americana has been discovered near the Solovetsky Archipelago in the White Sea. The discovery has been confirmed morphologically, and the key species-specific traits have been analyzed: common view, P5 of females and males, structure of the male geniculate antenna. These traits have revealed the highest similarity between the study population and the Pacific E. americana. Genetic analysis has confirmed the morphological data. Differences between the White Sea and Pacific populations are minimal and amount to 1.4—1.7% for the mitochondrial CO1 gene.
The researchers indicate that the conditions in Blagopoluchiya Bay are similar to those in native habitats, while high anthropogenic load and rising average annual water temperatures in the White Sea also facilitate the naturalization of this species in the study area. Given the high abundance of E. americana in the study area, it can be assumed that this species has a high potential for dispersal in coastal, freshened areas of the White Sea. However, near the Solovetsky Archipelago, this species appears to be in competition with crustaceans of the genus Acartia, suggesting a mutually exclusive relationship.
It is expected that the studied species will find other suitable water areas in the White Sea, and possibly beyond. Considering the relatively large size of this invader for a zooplankton species, as well as its high population density in the search area, it can be assumed that E. americana will become another food source for juvenile fish in estuaries and freshened areas of the White Sea.


Finance info: The State Assignments for Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences no. 125012800888-5 (N.S.) and No. 125012800889-2 (N.U.) supported the research The genetic part of the research was funded by the RSF grant 23-24-00296 (N.S.). The authors thank Roman Zdorovennov (Northern water problems Institute of Karelian Reseacrh Center of RAS) for providing data on the hydrology of Blagopoluchiya Bay. The researchers used the Federal collection of Zoological Institute, RAS. The genetic portion of the research was performed at the Taxon Collective Use Center, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, and sequencing was performed at Eurogen CJSC (Moscow).

References:

1. Kos M. S. New species of the genus Eurytemora from Chupa Bay (White Sea). Marine plankton (systematics, ecology, distribution). Issledovaniya fauny morei [Explorations of the fauna of the seas], 1993, vol. 45 (53), pp. 30—37. (In Russian).

2. Sukhikh N., Castric V., Polyakova N. et al. Isolated populations of Eurytemora americana Williams (Crustacea, Copepoda) in the White Sea rock pools — postglacial relicts or anthropogenic invasions? Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2016, no. 7 (4), pp. 396—404. DOI: 10.1134/S2075111716040093.

3. Fefilova E., Sukhikh N., Abramova E. et al. About the systematics of Palearctic Eurytemora (Copepoda, Calanoida) based on morphological analysis, with focus on Eurytemora gracilicauda Akatova, 1949. Crustaceana, 2020, no. 93, pp. 299—315. DOI: 10.1163/15685403-00003976.

4. Kos M. S. Species of the genus Eurytemora (Copepoda, Calanoida) of the North Pacific Ocean: systematics, distribution, variability. Marine plankton (systematics and faunistics). Issledovaniya fauny morei [Explorations of the fauna of the seas], 1977, vol. 20 (28), pp. 20—53. (In Russian).

5. Kos M. S. Copepods of the Stephidae and Temoridae Families (Copepoda: Calanoida) of the Russian Seas and Adjacent Waters. Opredeliteli po faune Rossii [Keys to the fauna of Russia], 2016, vol. 179, 108 ð. (In Russian).

6. Borutsky E. V., Stepanova L. A., Kos M. S. Key to Calanoida fresh waters of the USSR. Opredeliteli po faune SSSR [Keys to the fauna of the USSR]. Vol. 157. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, 1991, 504 p. (In Russian).

7. Lowndes A. G. Eurytemora thompsoni, A. Willey, a new European record. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 1931, vol. 8 (10), pp. 501—507.

8. Brylinski J.-M. The pelagic copepods in the Strait of Dover (Eastern English Channel). A commented inventory 120 years after Eugene Canu. Cah. Biol. Mar., 2009, no. 50, pp. 251—260.

9. Williams L. W. Notes on marine Copepoda of Rhode Island. Am. Nat., 1906, no. 40, pp. 639—660.

10. Moon S. Y., Choi J. H., Kim J. N. Kim S. K. et al. New extension range and complementary description of Eurytemora americana (Calanoida: Temoridae) in northern Korea. Mar. Biodivers. Rec., 2016, no. 9, p. 76. DOI: 10.1186/s41200-016-0076-8.

11. Tsuruta A., Yamada M. Hydrological and biological observations in Dokai Bay, northern Kyushu-I. Representative species occurring in plankton samples. J. Shimonoseki Univ. Fish., 1978, no. 27, pp. 101—111. (In Japanese with English abstract).

12. Hoffmeyer M. S., Frost B. W., Castro M. B. Eurytemora americana Williams, 1906, not Eurytemora affinis (Poppe, 1880), inhabits the Bahía Blanca Estuary, Argentina. Scientia Marina, 2000, no. 64, pp. 111—113. DOI: 10.3989/scimar.2000.64n1111.

13. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 1994, no. 22, pp. 4673—4680. DOI: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.

14. Hall T. A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser., 1999, no. 41, pp. 95—98.

15. Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W. et al. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol., 1994, no. 3, pp. 294—299.

16. White T. J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, 1990, pp. 315—322.

17. Sukhikh N., Abramova E., Holl A. C. et al. A comparative analysis of genetic differentiation of the E. affinis species complex and some other Eurytemora species, using the CO1, nITS and 18SrRNA genes (Copepoda, Calanoida). Crustaceana, 2020, no. 93 (3—5), pp. 931—955. DOI: 10.1163/15685403-bja10074.

18. Tamura K., Stecher G., Kumar S. MEGA 11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2021, no. 38, pp. 3022—3027. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab120.

19. Posada D. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2008, no. 25, pp. 1253—1256. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn083.

20. Lukina Yu. N., Zdorovennov R. E., Tolstikov A. V. et al. Features of the hydrodynamic and hydrochemical regimes of Blagopoluchiya Bay (Solovetsky Islands of the White Sea) in August 2024. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2025, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 287—299. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2025-2-287-299. (In Russian).

21. Kalinkina N. M., Galakhina N. E., Kostromin E. A. et al. Trophic status of Blagopoluchiya Bay (Solovetsky Islands of the White Sea) in the summer of 2024. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2025, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 592—604. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2025-4-592-604. (In Russian).

22. Hoffmeyer M. S., Berasategui A. A., Beigt D. et al. Environmental regulation of the estuarine copepods Acartia tonsa and Eurytemora americana during coexistence period. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 2009, no. 89 (2), pp. 355—361. DOI: 10.1017/S0025315408001987.

23. Dodson S. I., Skelly D. A., Lee C. E. Out of Alaska: morphological diversity within the genus Eurytemora from its ancestral Alaskan range (Crustacea, Copepoda). Hydrobiologia, 2010, no. 653, pp. 131—148. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-010-0351-3.

24. Strange M. V., Jónasdóttir S. H., Nielsen T. G. The autumn plankton community of an Arctic fjord: impact of temperature and salinity on the functional response of two copepod species “to watch”. J. Plankton Res., 2025, no. 47 (3), fbaf014. DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbaf014.

25. Frolander H. F., Miller C. B., Flynn M. J. et al. Seasonal cycles of abundance in zooplankton populations of Yaquina Bay, Oregon. Mar. Biology, 1973, no. 21, pp. 277—288. DOI: 10.1007/BF00381084.

26. Filatov N. N., Nazarova L. E., Druzhinin P. V. The influence of climatic and anthropogenic factors on the state of the “White Sea — catchment” system. Trudy KarNC RAN [Proceedings of the Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2019, no. 9, pp. 30—50. DOI: 10.17076/lim1117. (In Russian).

27. Leppakoski E., Gollasch S., Olenin S. Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe. Distribution. Impacts and Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002, 583 p.

28. Avila L., Martinez-Silva M., Sirois P. et al. Eurytemora unmasked: trophic role of a cryptic copepod complex in larval rainbow smelt. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 2024, vol. 751, pp. 153—171. DOI: 10.3354/meps14744.

29. Berasategui A. A., Calliari D. L., Amodeo M. et al. Interannual changes in winter-spring zooplankton estuarine community forced by hydroclimatic variability — With special reference to bioindicator species Eurytemora americana. Mar. Env. Research, 2023, no. 186, p. 105898. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105898.


Download »


© 2011-2026 Arctic: ecology and economy
DOI 10.25283/2223-4594