| ||||
| ||||
|
Home » Archive of journals » Volume 16, No. 3, 2026 » Zonal Patterns of Change in Vegetation Cover and Soil Moisture in Typical Tundra under Climate Warming Conditions (A Case Study of the Marresal Area, Yamal Peninsula) ZONAL PATTERNS OF CHANGE IN VEGETATION COVER AND SOIL MOISTURE IN TYPICAL TUNDRA UNDER CLIMATE WARMING CONDITIONS (A CASE STUDY OF THE MARRESAL AREA, YAMAL PENINSULA)JOURNAL: Volume 16, No. 3, 2026, p. 347-360HEADING: Research activities in the Arctic AUTHORS: Kornienko, S.G. ORGANIZATIONS: Oil and Gas Research Institute of RAS DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2026-3-347-360 UDC: 528.854.4; 551.34 The article was received on: 02.02.2026 Keywords: climate change, geocryological conditions, tundra, vegetation cover, soil moisture, geomorphological levels, landscape types, trend analysis, Landsat Bibliographic description: Kornienko, S.G. Zonal Patterns of Change in Vegetation Cover and Soil Moisture in Typical Tundra under Climate Warming Conditions (A Case Study of the Marresal Area, Yamal Peninsula). Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2026, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 347-360. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2026-3-347-360. (In Russian). Abstract: Under climate warming, the intensity of permafrost transformation process depends on many factors, including topography, landscape types, vegetation cover, and soil composition and moisture. Therefore, the author considers it relevant to identify the factors that most significantly influence permafrost stability, as well as to determine surface properties (indicators) that characterize its degradation. The aim of the study is to assess how climate warming alters vegetation properties and soil moisture across different landscape types and geomorphological levels, and to evaluate the relationship between these changes and geocryological conditions. The analysis is based on Landsat satellite data acquired between 1985 and 2024 for an area of typical tundra on the western coast of the Yamal Peninsula. Vegetation and moisture dynamics were quantified using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), and the temperature-vegetation soil moisture index (WI, Wet Index). The identified trends in the indices show a dominant influence of topography on the rate of soil moisture and vegetation cover growth. Thus, the change rates of indices can be considered as indicators of changes in the depth of the seasonal thaw layer. Finance info: This work was carried out within the framework of the state assignment “Improving the efficiency and environmental safety of hydrocarbon resource development on the shelf and adjacent land in the Arctic and subarctic regions of Russia in a changing climate” no. 125020501403-7. References: 1. Beamish A., Raynolds M. K., Epstein H., Frost G. V., Macander M. J., Bergstedt H., Bartsch A., Kruse S., Miles V., Tanis C. M., Heim B., Fuchs M., Chabrillat S., Shevtsova I., Verdonen M., Wagner J. Recent trends and remaining challenges for optical remote sensing of Arctic tundra vegetation: A review and outlook. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020, vol. 246, no. 1, p. 111872. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111872. 2. Clayton L. K., Schaefer K., Battaglia M. J., Bourgeau-Chavez L., Chen J., Chen R. H., Chen A., Bakian-Dogaheh K., Grelik S., Jafarov E., Liu L., Michaelides R. J., Moghaddam M., Parsekian A. D., Rocha A. V., Schaefer S. R., Sullivan T., Tabatabaeenejad A., Wang K., Wilson C. J., Zebker H. A., Zhang T., Zhao Y. Active layer thickness as a function of soil water content. Environ. Res. Lett., 2021, vol. 16, p. 055028. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfa4c. 3. Khani H. M., Kinnard C., Gascoin S., Levesque E. Fine-scale environment control on ground surface temperature and thaw depth in a High Arctic tundra landscape. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2023, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 467—480. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2203. 4. Heijmans M. M. P. D., Magnusson R. I., Lara M. J., Frost G. V., Myers-Smith I. H., van Huissteden J., Jorgenson M. T., Fedorov A. N., Epstein H. E., Lawrence D. M., Limpens J. Tundra vegetation change and impacts on permafrost. Nature Reviews Earth & Environ., 2022, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 68—84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00233-0. 5. Park H., Walsh J., Fedorov A. N., Sherstiukov A. B., Iijima Y., Ohata T. The influence of climate and hydrological variables on opposite anomaly in active-layer thickness between Eurasian and North American watersheds. The Cryosphere, 2013, vol. 7, pp. 631—645. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-631-2013. 6. Liu Y., Wu X., Wu T., Hu G., Zou D., Qiao Y., Wei X., Fan X., Yan X. Climate warming controls vegetation growth with increasing importance of permafrost degradation in the Northern hemisphere during 1982—2022. Remote Sensing, 2025, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010104. 7. Vasiliev A. A., Drozdov D. S., Gravis A. G., Malkova G. V., Nyland K. E., Streletskiy D. A. Permafrost degradation in the Western Russian Arctic. Environ. Res. Lett., 2020, vol. 15, p. 045001. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6f12. 8. Yang Y., Wang X., Wang T. Permafrost degradation induces the abrupt changes of vegetation NDVI in the Northern Hemisphere. Earth’s Future, 2024, vol. 12, p. e2023EF0004309. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004309. 9. Kornienko S. G., Elsakov V. V. Assessment of informativeness of temperature-vegetation index as an indicator of moisture content of tundra ground vegetation cover. Current problems in remote sensing of the Earth from space, 2024, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 155—170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21046/2070-7401-2024-21-3-155-170. (In Russian). 10. Liu C., Huang H., Sun F. A pixel-based vegetation greenness trend analysis over the Russian tundra with all available Landsat data from 1984 to 2018. Remote Sensing, 2021, vol. 13, no. 23, p. 4933. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13234933. 11. Pastick N. J., Jorgenson M. T., Wylie B. K., Nield S. J., Johnson K. D., Finley A. O. Distribution of near-surface permafrost in Alaska: Estimates of present and future conditions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, vol. 168, pp. 301—315. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.019. 12. Wenzl M., Baumhoer C. A., Dietz A. J., Kuenzer C. Vegetation changes in the Arctic: A review of earth observation applications. Remote Sensing, 2024, vol. 16, no. 23, p. 4509. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234509. 13. Tucker C. J. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1979, vol. 8, pp. 127—150. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0. 14. Boñai Gao. NDWI — A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 257—266. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3. 15. Giese L., Baumberger M., Ludwig M., Schneidereit H., Sánchez E., Robroek B. J. M., Lamentowicz M., Lehmann J. R. K., Hölzel N., Knorr K.-H., Meyer H. Recent trends in moisture conditions across European peatlands. Remote Sens. Appl.: Society and Environ., 2025, vol. 37, p. 101385. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101385. 16. Sandholt I., Rasmussen K., Andersen J. A simple interpretation of the surface temperature/vegetation index space for assessment of surface moisture status. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, vol. 79, pp. 213—224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00274-7. 17. Burdun I., Bechtold M., Sagris V., Komisarenko V., De Lannoy G., Mander Ü. A comparison of three trapezoid models using optical and thermal satellite imagery for water table depth monitoring in Estonian bogs. Remote Sensing, 2020, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 1980. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12121980. 18. Sadeghi M., Babaeian E., Tuller M., Jones S. B. The optical trapezoid model: A novel approach to remote sensing of soil moisture applied to Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 observations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, vol. 198, pp. 52—68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.05.041. 19. Schieldge J. P., Kahle A. B., Alley R. E., Gillespie A. R. Use of thermal inertia properties for material identification. SPIE Image Processing for Missile Guidance, 1980, vol. 238, pp. 350—357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.959165. 20. Kornienko S. G. Variations in thermal diffusivity of the tundra cover according to data from field observations during the summer period. Earth’s Cryosphere, 2022, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 9—18. 21. Oblogov G. E., Vasiliev A. A., Streletskaya I. D., Zadorozhnaya N. A., Kuznetsova A. O., Kanevskiy M. Z., Semenov P. B. Methane content and emission in the permafrost landscapes of western Yamal, Russian Arctic. Geosciences, 2020, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 412. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100412. 22. Dubrovin V. A., Kritsuk L. N. The research results of the frozen rock mass temperature regime in the Marre-Sale region on the Yamal peninsula. Engineering Geology, 2010, no. 3, pp. 68—74. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/ncxixp. (In Russian). 23. Vasiliev A. A., Oblogov G. E., Shirokov R. S. Long-term monitoring of the active layer thickness in typical tundras of the western Yamal. Earth’s Cryosphere, 2023, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 3—11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15372/KZ20230401. (In Russian). 24. Xu H. Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Intern. J. of Remote Sensing, 2006, vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 3025—3033. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600589179. 25. Van de Griend A. A., Owe M. On the relationship between thermal emissivity and the normalized different vegetation index for natural surfaces. Intern. J. of Remote Sensing, 1993, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1119—1131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169308904400. 26. Artis D. A., Carnahan W. H. Survey of emissivity variability in thermography of urban areas. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1982, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 313—329. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(82)90043-8. 27. Teillet P. M., Barker J. I., Markham B. L., Irish R. R., Fedosejevs G., Storey J. C. Radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-5 TM sensors based on tandem data sets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, vol. 78, no. 1—2, pp. 39—54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00248-6. 28. Holden C. E., Woodcock C. E. An analysis of Landsat 7 and Landsat 8 under flight data and the implications for time series investigations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, vol. 185, pp. 16—36. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.052. 29. Tishkov A. A., Belonovskaya E. A., Vaisfeld M. A., Glazov P. M., Krenke A. N., Tertytsky G. M. “The greening” of the tundra as a driver of the modern dynamics of arctic biota. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2018, no. 2 (30), ðð. 31—44. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2018-2-31-44. (In Russian). 30. Iijima Y., Fedorov A. N., Park H., Suzuki K., Yabuki H., Maximov T. C., Ohata T. Abrupt increases in soil temperatures following increased precipitation in a permafrost region, central Lena River basin, Russia. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2010, vol. 21, pp. 30—41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.662. 31. Tishkov A. A., Titova S. V. Fires in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation: new assessments, the role of climate change and possible consequences. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2025, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 98 — 108. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2025-1-98-108. (In Russian). 32. Jin X-Y., Jin H-J., Iwahana G., Marchenko S. S., Luo D-L., Li X-Y., Liang S-H. Impacts of climate-induced permafrost degradation on vegetation: A review. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2021, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29—47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2020.07.002. 33. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Nikonov R. A. Development monitoring of the C22 gas blowout Doublet object on Yamal peninsula using remote sensing data. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2024, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 320—333. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2024-3-320-333. (In Russian). 34. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Bogoyavlensky I. V., Nikonov R. A., Gavrilov A. A. Anomalous rapid growth and explosion of the C23 Yamal gas-dynamic heaving mound in 2020—2024. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2025, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 4—17. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2025-3-4-17. (In Russian). 35. Hellevang H., Ippach M. R., Westermann S., Nooraiepour M. Formation of giant Siberian gas emission craters (GECs). Science of The Total Environment, 2025, vol. 995, p. 180042. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180042. Download » | ||||
|
© 2011-2026 Arctic: ecology and economy
DOI 10.25283/2223-4594
|