| ||||
| ||||
Home » Archive of journals » Volume 14, No. 1, 2024 » On the mechanism of destruction of ice films of metastable gas hydrates and its possible application to the process of methane emission in the Arctic ON THE MECHANISM OF DESTRUCTION OF ICE FILMS OF METASTABLE GAS HYDRATES AND ITS POSSIBLE APPLICATION TO THE PROCESS OF METHANE EMISSION IN THE ARCTICJOURNAL: Volume 14, No. 1, 2024, p. 36-45HEADING: Research activities in the Arctic AUTHORS: Garagash, I.A., Lobkovsky, L.I. ORGANIZATIONS: P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2024-1-36-45 UDC: 502:631.4(98) The article was received on: 25.07.2023 Keywords: metastable gas hydrates, methane emission, instability in the large, micropolar continuum, bifurcation Bibliographic description: Garagash, I.A., Lobkovsky, L.I. On the mechanism of destruction of ice films of metastable gas hydrates and its possible application to the process of methane emission in the Arctic. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2024, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 36-45. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2024-1-36-45. (In Russian). Abstract: The release of methane deposits in the Arctic, which is bound in the form of gas hydrates, can accelerate global warming. The threat of increasing methane content in the atmosphere is associated with the decomposition of gas hydrates located in the sedimentary layer in a metastable state. The authors formulate destruction mechanisms that can affect the dissociation of natural gas hydrates and assess the risks of possible gas emissions during the advancement of slow tectonic waves. They have studied the instability of moving granules of the sedimentary strata and obtained the condition for the bifurcation of the micropolar continuum, which may be associated with the emission of methane from zones of accumulation of metastable relict gas hydrates. Comment of the editorial board of the journal “Arctic: Ecology and Economy”. According to the reviewers and the editorial board, the article is debatable, hypothetical in nature without reference to real natural conditions and without an evidence-based experimental base. At the same time, the proposed hypothesis has the right to exist and subsequent scientific discussion. In this regard, the editorial board decided to publish the article taking into account this comment. Finance info: The Russian Science Foundation grant supported the study (project No. 22-67-00025 “Field studies, experimental and mathematical modeling of gas-dynamic processes in the bottom sediment-water column system on the Russian Arctic shelf”). References: 1. Istomin V. A., Yakushev V. S., Makhonina N. A., Kwon V. G., Chuvilin E. Self-preservation phenomenon of gas hydrates. Digest Gas Industry of Russia, 2006, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 16—27. 2. Yakushev V. S. Natural gas and gas hydrates in the permafrost zone. Moscow, VNIIGAZ, 2009, 192 p. (In Russian). 3. Shakhova N., Semiletov I., Chuvilin E. Understanding the permafrost–hydrate system and associated methane releases in the east Siberian Arctic Shelf. Geosciences, 2019, vol. 9, iss. 6. 4. Shakhova N., Semiletov I., Sergienko V., Lobkovsky L., Yusupov V., Salyuk A., Salomatin A., Chernykh D., Kosmach D., Panteleev G., Nicolsky D., Samarkin V., Joye S., Charkin A., Dudarev O., Meluzov A., Gustafsson O. The East Siberian Arctic Shelf: towards further assessment of permafrost-related methane fluxes and role of sea ice. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2015, vol. 373, iss. 2052. DOI:10.1098/rsta.2014.0451. 5. Shakhova N., Semiletov I., Gustafsson O., Sergienko V., Lobkovsky L., Dudarev O., Tumskoy V., Grigoriev M., Mazurov A., Salyuk A., Ananiev R., Koshurnikov A., Kosmach D., Charkin A., Dmitrevsky N., Karnaukh V., Gunar A., Meluzov A., Chernykh D. Current rates and mechanisms of subsea permafrost degradation in the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 15872. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms15872. 6. Shakhova N. E., Sergienko V. I., Semiletov I. P. The Contribution of the East Siberian Shelf to the Modern Methane Cycle. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 237—246. 7. Barenblatt G. I., Lobkovsky L. I., Nigmatullin R. I. Mathematical model of gas outflow from gas-saturated ice and gas hydrates. Doklady Akademii nauk [Reports of the Academy of Sciences], 2016, no. 4 (470), pp. 458—461. (In Russian). 8. Bogoyavlensky V. I. Natural and technogenic threats during the development of fossil fuel deposits in the Earth’s cryolithosphere Gornaia Promishlenost. Mining Industry, 2020, no. 1, pp. 97—118. (In Russian). 9. Bogoyavlensky V. I., Garagash I. A. Substantiation of the process of formation of gas emission craters in the Arctic by mathematical modeling. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2015, no. 3 (19), pp. 12—17. (In Russian). 10. Lobkovsky L. I. Possible seismogenic trigger mechanism of a sharp activation of methane emissions and climate warming in the Arctic. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2020, no. 3 (39), pp. 62—72. (In Russian). 11. Garagash I. A., Lobkovsky L. I. Deformation tectonic waves as a possible trigger mechanism for activating methane emissions in the Arctic. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2021, no. 1, pp. 42—50. (In Russian). 12. Kolosova E. A., Lukk A. A., Serova O. A., Sidorin A. Ya. Natural and technogenic sources of trigger activity of seismicity and seismic noise. Nauka i Tekhnologicheskie Razrabotki [Science and Technological Developments], 2015, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 30—43. (In Russian). 13. Sens-Schonfelder C., Eulenfeld T. Probing the in situ Elastic Nonlinearity of Rocks with Earth Tides and Seismic Noise. Physical review letters, 2019, 122 (13), pp. 1—6. 14. Metivier L., Viron O., Conrad C. P., Renault S., Diament M., Patau G. Evidence of earthquake triggering by the solid earth tides. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2009, vol. 278, pp. 370—375. 15. Nikolaevsky V. N. Mechanics of Porous and Fractured Media. Singapore, World Scientific, 1990, 472 p. 16. Garagash I. A. Model of dynamics of fragmented media with movable blocks. Physical Mesomechanics, 2002, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 71—78. (In Russian). 17. Garagash I. A., Nikolaevsky V. N. Kosser mechanics for Earth sciences. Vychislitelnaya mekhanika sploshnykh sred. [Computational mechanics of continuous media], 2009, pp. 44—66. (In Russian). 18. Drucker D. C. A definition of stable inelastic materials. J. of Applied Mechanics, 1959, 26, pp. 101—106. 19. Nadai A. Plastic. Moscow, Leningrad, Joint Scientific and Technical Publishing House (ONTI) NKTP USSR, 1936. (In Russian). 20. Biot M. A. Mechanics of incremental deformations. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1965, 497 p. 21. Thomas T. Plastic flow and fracture in solids. Moscow, Mir, 1964. (In Russian). 22. Rudnicki J. W., Rice J. R. Conditions for localization of deformation in pressure-sensitive dilatant materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1975, 23, no. 6, pp. 371—390. 23. Nikolaevsky V. N. Constitutive equations for plastic deformation of granular media. Prikladnaya matematika i mehanika [Applied mathematics and mechanics], 1971, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1070—1082. (In Russian). 24. Nikolaevsky V. N. Mechanics of porous and fractured media. M., Nedra, 1984, 232 p. (In Russian). 25. Garagash I. A. Conditions for the formation of regular systems of shear bands and compaction. Geologia i Geofizika. [Geology and Geophysics], 2006, vol. 47, pp. 657—668. (In Russian). 26. Garagash I. A. Formation of cellular structures in an elastoplastic medium with internal friction and dilatancy. Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR. [Report of USSR Academy of Sciences], 1982, vol. 266, no. 1. (In Russian). 27. Jaeger J. C., Cook N. G. W., Zimmerman R. W. Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, 4th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. 2007. 475 p. 28. Timoshenko S. P., Goodier J. N. Theory of Elasticity. 3rd. ed. McGraw-Hill, 1970, 506 p. 29. Mises R. Uber die stabilitatsprobleme der elastizitatstheorie. ZAMM, 1923, 3, 406422. 30. Bazant Z. P. Cedolin L. Stability of structures elastic, inelastic, fracture, and damage theories. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991, 1011 p. 31. Garagash I. A., Osiptsov A. A., Boronin S. A. Dynamic bridging of proppant particles in a hydraulic fracture. Intern. J. of Engineering Science, 2019, vol. 135, pp. 86—101. 32. Eringen A. C. Theory of Micropolar Elasticity. Fracture. H. Liebowitz (Ed.). Cambridge, Academic Press, 1968, pp. 621—729. Download » | ||||
© 2011-2024 Arctic: ecology and economy
DOI 10.25283/2223-4594
|