ASSESSING THE RESILIENCE POTENTIAL OF THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC CITIES: THE FACTOR OF ECONOMIC SPECIALIZATION

This paper proposes an original methodology for assessing the impact of economic specialization on the resilience potential of Russian Arctic cities. The author understands the resilience as the ability of urban economies to adapt to crises, especially structural ones. He considers the key concepts of urban and regional development, in which the impact of economic specialization factor on resilience are assessed. The author takes into account the specifics of the Arctic urban systems that evolve focusing mainly on the resource development of the territory. As a result, he ranks 28 Russian Arctic cities on the resilience potential basis. The ranking consists of four quantitative indicators with equal weight. These are the degree of diversification of the economy in terms of employment structure, the level of the extractive industry development, the share of innovative firms and the patent activity level. The cities differ mostly by the last two indicators responsible for the development of human capital and the generation of new niche industries of specialization. In terms of employment diversification and dependence on the extractive industry, the distribution is more even. Regional capitals, research and university centres acquire higher scores of resilience potential. By contrast, factors of location in suburban zone, on the remote periphery with low infrastructure provision or in areas with a high concentration of mineral resources negatively affect the assessment of the resilience of the cities. The ranking methodology can be applied to identify the risks Arctic cities are likely to face if they lose their current specialization.

1. Zhikharevich B. S., Klimanov V. V., Maracha V. G. Resilience of the territory: concept, measurement, governance. Regional’nye issledovaniya, 2020, no. 3 (69), pp. 4—15. DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2020-3-1. (In Russian).
2. Zamyatina N. Yu., Kotov E. A., Goncharov R. V. et al. Diversity of Russian Arctic cities in the context of resilience potential: an integrated approach. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya, 2022, no. 5, pp. 52—65. (In Russian).
3. Burtseva A. V., Sharova E. N., Oman S. Resilience of the Kola North cities in spatial, temporal and anthropological dimensions. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii, 2020, no. 3 (50), pp. 191—200. DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2020-50-3-17. (In Russian).
4. Pilyasov A. N., Molodtsova V. A. Resilience of Russian Arctic cities: methodological approaches and quantitative assessments. Izvestiya Komi nauchnogo tsentra UrO RAN. Seriya “Ekonomicheskie nauki”, 2021, no. 2 (48), pp. 5—26. DOI: 10.19110/1994-5655-2021-2-5-26. (In Russian).
5. Jacobs J. The Economy of Cities. New York, Vintage Books, 1970, 288 p.
6. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London, Routledge, 1942, 437 p.
7. Feldman M., Audretsch D. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Rev., 1999, vol. 43 (2), pp. 409—429. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6.
8. Markusen A., Schrock G. The Distinctive City: Divergent Patterns in Growth, Hierarchy and Specialisation. Urban Studies, 2006, vol. 43 (8), pp. 1301—1323. DOI: 10.1080/00420980600776392.
9. Glaeser E., Kolko J. Saiz A. Consumer City. J. of Economic Geography, 2001, vol. 1 (1), pp. 27—50. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/1.1.27.
10. Storper M. Why Does a City Grow? Specialisation, Human Capital or Institutions? Urban Studies, 2010, vol. 47 (10), pp. 2027—2050. DOI: 10.1177/0042098009359957.
11. Slavin S. V. Industrial and transport development of the North of the USSR. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo ekonomicheskoi literatury, 1961, 303 p. (In Russian).
12. Kosmachev K. P. Pioneering taiga development: economic and geographical challenges. Novosibirsk, Nauka. Sib. otdelenie, 1974, 144 p. (In Russian).
13. Sysoev A. A. Economic and geographical aspects of the study of the development bases, Theory of economic development of the territory. K. P. Kosmachev (ed.). Irkutsk, In-t geografii Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka Sibir. otd-niya AN SSSR, 1979, pp. 103—116. (In Russian).
14. Van Assche K., Deacon L., Gruezmacher M. et al. Boom & Bust: A Guide to managing ups and downs in communities. Edmonton, Alberta, Univ. of Alberta, 2016, 234 p.
15. Huskey L. Alaska’s Economy: The First World War, Frontier Fragility, and Jack London. The Northern Rev., 2017, vol. 44, pp. 327—346. DOI: 10.22584/nr44.2017.014.
16. Zamyatina N. Yu. Bifurcations of the Fate of a Frontier City: Igarka Lessons. EKO, 2021, no. 1, pp. 67—92. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2021-1-67-92. (In Russian).
17. Shiklomanov N., Streletskiy D., Suter L., Orttung R., Zamyatina N. Dealing with the bust in Vorkuta, Russia. Land Use Policy, 2020, vol. 93, pp. 1—11. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.021.
18. Zamyatina N. Yu., Pilyasov A. N. Innovative search in monospecialised cities: development blockages, new industrial policy and a roadmap for change. Moscow, URSS, 2015, 216 p. (In Russian).
19. Hopkins R. The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience. Totnes, Devon, Green Books Ltd., 2018, 340 p.
20. Martin R., Sunley P., Gardiner B., Tyler P. How Regions React to Recessions: Resilience and the Role of Economic Structure. Regional Studies, 2016, vol. 50 (4), pp. 561—585. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410.
21. Ray M., MacLachlan I., Lamarche R., Srinath K. Economic shock and regional resilience: Continuity and change in Canada’s regional employment structure, 1987—2012. Environment and Planning A, 2017, vol. 49 (4), pp. 952—973. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X16681788.
22. Suarez M., Gomez-Baggethun E., Benayas J., Tilbury D. Towards an Urban Resilience Index: A Case Study in 50 Spanish Cities. Sustainability, 2016, vol. 8 (8), pp. 774—793. DOI: 10.3390/su8080774.
23. Zamyatina N., Goncharov R. Population mobility and the contrasts between cities in the Russian Arctic and their southern Russian counterparts. Area Development and Policy, 2018, vol. 3 (3), pp. 293—308. DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2018.1500863.
24. Duranton G., Puga D. Diversity and Specialisation in Cities: Why, where and when does it matter? Urban Studies, 2000, vol. 37 (3), pp. 533—555. DOI: 10.1080/0042098002104.
25. Goncharov R. V., Dankin M. A., Zamyatina N. Yu., Molodtsova V. A. Cathedrals in the desert or strongholds? The typology of the settlements in the Russian Arctic by their interconnections with the surrounding territory. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki, 2021, no. 5 (1), pp. 33—56. DOI: 10.17323/usp51202033-56. (In Russian).
26. Duranton G., Puga D. From sectoral to functional urban specialization. J. of Urban Economics, 2005, vol. 57 (2), pp. 343—370. DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2004.12.002.
27. Klimanov V., Kazakova S., Mikhaylova A. Economic and Fiscal Resilience of Russia’s Regions. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 2020, vol. 12 (4), pp. 627—640. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12282.
28. Baburin V. L., Zemtsov S. P. Factors of patent activity in Russian regions. Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya, 2016, no. 16 (1), pp. 86—100. (In Russian).
29. Pilyasov A. N., Putilova E. S. Challenging the obvious: Arctic cities. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki, 2021, no. 5 (1), pp. 9—32. DOI: 10.17323/usp5120209-32. (In Russian).
30. Zamyatina N. Yu., Goncharov R. V. Arctic urbanization: a phenomenon and a comparative analysis. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya, 2020, no. 4, pp. 69—82. (In Russian).