DEMOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SETTLEMENTS IN THE ASIAN PART OF THE ARCTIC ZONE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

According to the materials of the All-Union and All-Russian population censuses (1989, 2002, 2010), in the settlements of the Asian part of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, the author reviled differentiation of demographic development in the context of groups by the period of formation: 1) a group of settlements of the industrial promotional period (formed within 1960—1991), characterized by a high proportion of settlements with a demographic crisis (a decrease in the population by more than 10% in 2010 compared to the population in 1989) and a demographic catastrophe (a decrease in more than 40%), which is the least stable according to the results of the demographic assessment; 2) the pre-Soviet group of settlements (until 1917) in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation within the boundaries of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Area and the Krasnoyarsk Territory and the group of the industrial-forced period (1918—1959) of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation within the boundaries of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) and the Chukot Autonomous Area, which are the most stable according to the results of the demographic assessment. Recommendations are given to regional and municipal managers on conducting a differentiated demographic policy for various groups of settlements by the period of their formation within the boundaries of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the Asian part of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, based on strategic planning tools and differentiated taxation.

1. Mihaylov V., Runge J. Identifications of Individuals. Territorial communities and social space: an attempt of conceptualisation. Sociological Studies, 2019, no. 1, рр. 52—62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250003747-4. (In Russian).
2. Sharygin M. D. Some Aspects of Geographical Science Theory. Regional Research of Russia, 2010, vol. 142, рр. 13—21. (In Russian).
3. Kaplan D. H. Territorial Identities and Geographic Scale. Nested Identities. Nationalism, Territory and State. [S. l.], Rowmann & Littlefield, 1999, рр. 31—52.
4. Fauzer V. V., Smirnov A. V., Lytkina T. S., Fauzer G. N. Methodology for Defining Pivotal Settlements in the Russian Arctic. Economic and social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2019, vol. 12, no. 5, рр. 25—43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2019.5.65.2.
5. Nefedova T. G., Treyvish A. I. The Transformation of Settlement in modern Russia: urbanization or de-urbanization? Regional Studies, 2017, no. 2, рр. 12—23. (In Russian).
6. Puga D. Urbanization Patterns: European Versus Less Developed Countries. J. of Regional Science, 1998, vol. 38, no. 2, рр. 231—252.
7. Hamilton L. C., Wirsing J., Saito K. Demographic Variation and Change in the Inuit Arctic. Environmental Research Letters, 2018, vol. 13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae7ef.
8. Hill F., Gaddy C. The Siberian Curse: How Communist Planners Left Russia Out in the Cold. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press, 2003, 302 p.
9. Erokhina E. A. ‘Nomadism’ of the North: mobility of ethnic groups of indigenous and non-indigenous population in the practices of spatial development in Siberia (the case of Surgut rayon of Yugra). The New Research of Tuva, 2019, no. 3, рр. 66—76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2019.3.6. (In Russian).
10. Fauzer V. V., Smirnov A. V., Fauzer G. N. Demographic Assessment of the Sustainability of Small and Medium-sized Cities in the Russian North. Economy of region, 2021, vol. 38, no. 2, рр. 552—569. (In Russian).
11. Fauzer V. V., Lytkina T. S., Smirnov A. V. Arctic territories differentiation by density of population and economic development. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2017, no. 4 (28), рр. 18—31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25283/2223-4594-2017-4-18-31. (In Russian).
12. Gavrikova A. V., Ishmuratova D. F., Migunova Yu. V., Sadykov R. M., Fayzullin F. S., Shagyeva L. A. Social sustainability of the region: diagnostics and development problems. Ufa, ISER UFRC RAS, 2017, 188 p. (In Russian).
13. Steensma H. K., Marino L., Weaver K. M., Dickson P. H. The Influence of National Culture on the Formation of Technology Alliances by Entrepreneurial Firms. Academy of Management J., 2000, vol. 43, no. 5, рр. 951—973.
14. Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 2001, 137 p.
15. Kryukov V. A., Suslov N. I., Kryukov Ya. V. Asian Russia’s Energy Complex in a Changing World. World Economy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 12, рр. 101—108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-12-101-108. (In Russian).
16. Leonard M., Pisani-Ferry J., Shapiro J., Tagliapietra S., Wolf G. The geopolitics of the European Green Deal. International Organisations Research J., 2021, vol. 16, no. 2, рр. 204—235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2021-02-10. (In Russian).
17. Zamyatina N. Yu. Northern city-base: its special features and potential for the Arctic development. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2020, no. 2 (38), рр. 4—17. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2020-2-4-17. (In Russian).
18. Tsvetkov V. A., Dudin M. N., Yuryeva A. A. Strategic Development of the Arctic Region in the Context of Great Challenges and Threats. Economy of region, 2020, vol. 16, no. 3, рр. 681—695. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-1. (In Russian).
19. Alaev E. B. Socio-economic geography: Conceptual and terminological dictionary. Moscow, 1983, 350 p. (In Russian).
20. Sysoeva N. M. The Development of a Regions consumer environment. Novosibirsk, V. B. Sochava Inst. of Geography, 2004, 189 p. (In Russian).
21. Kravchuk A. A. Norway’s economic policy in the Arctic. World Economy and Intern. Relations, 2020, vol.  64, no. 5, рр. 101—108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-5-101-108. (In Russian).
22. Kravchuk A. A. Iceland’s Economic Growth Prospects in the Post-COVID-19 period. Contemporary Europe, 2021, no. 3 (103), рр. 128—138. https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope32021128138. (In Russian).