ENSURING ECOLOGICAL SAFETY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SHELF SEAS RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ON THE BASIS OF THE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF MARINE ECOSYSTEMS TO TECHNOGENIC IMPACT

The article considers the method of integrated sustainability assessment of the shelf seas ecosystems, including the Arctic, to anthropogenic impact on the basis of sound structural biocenotic, dynamic hydrological and dynamic oceanological indicators with high informational content and relative ease of determination. Three versions of the integrated index of the sustainability assessment — Integrated Assessment of Sustainable Existence (IASE) are developed using 6,9 and 15 indicators based on their quantitative values and rationing. Using the White Sea as an example, zoning of its waters is carried out in relation to assessing the degree of their sustainability. It is shown that increasing the efficiency in ensuring ecological safety and environmental management while developing mineral and biological resources of the Barents and White seas is possible on the basis of establishing the degree of sustainability of their ecosystems with further optimization of the spatial location of man-made objects and the acceptable level of anthropogenic impact on the environment. The compatibility matrices are built of technogenic activity on the sea shelf and coast with aquaculture functioning and ensuring reproduction of economically valuable populations of commercial fish in areas with integrated sustainability assessment corresponding to classes: I "very high", II "high", III "significant", V "moderate" and VII "very low". Methodological principles for the implementation of marine environmental management based on the application of the developed integral method for assessing the sustainability of marine ecosystems are substantiated. Practical use of the developed method of integrated assessment of the marine ecosystems sustainability based on the indicator approach can help to improve the effectiveness of management decisions in ensuring the environmental safety of most sectors of the marine economic complex.

1. Dmitriev V. V. Metodika diagnostiki sostoyaniya i ustoichivosti vodnykh ekosistem. [Metodika of diagnostics of a state and stability of water ecosystems]. Ekologo-geografi cheskii analiz sostoyaniya prirodnoi sredy: problema ustoichivosti geoekosistem. St. Petersburg, 1995, pp. 41—67. (In Russian).

2. Denisov V. V. Ekologo-geografi cheskie osnovy ustoichivogo prirodopol’zovaniya v shel’fovykh moryakh (ekologicheskaya geografi ya morya). [Ekologo-geografi chesky bases of steady environmental management in the shelf seas (ecological geography of the sea)]. Apatity, Izd. KNTs RAN, 2002, 502 p. (In Russian).

3. Dzhenyuk S. L. K obosnovaniyu kompleksnoi sistemy monitoringa morei Zapadnoi Arktiki. [To justifi cation of complex system of monitoring of the seas of the Western Arctic]. Vestn. Kol’skogo nauch. tsentra RAN, 2015, no. 2 (21), pp. 94—102. (In Russian).

4. Kondrin A. T., Kosarev A. N., Polyakova A. V. et al.Ekologicheskoe sostoyanie i ustoichivost’ k antropogennym nagruzkam morei evropeiskoi chasti Rossii. [Ecological condition and resistance to anthropogenic loadings of the seas of the European part of Russia]. Problemy otsenki ekologicheskoi napryazhennosti evropeiskoi territorii Rossii: faktory, raionirovanie, posledstviya. Moscow, Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1996, pp. 107—117. (In Russian).

5. Drozdov V. V. Printsipy otsenki ustoichivosti ekosistem Baltiiskogo, Belogo, Chernogo i Azovskogo morei k klimaticheskim izmeneniyam. [Principles of assessment of stability of ecosystems of the Baltic, White, Black and Azov seas to climatic changes]. Uch. zap. RGGMU, 2011, no. 19, pp. 127—139. (In Russian).

6. Mikhailov V. N., Edel’shtein K. K. Otsenka ustoichivosti i uyazvimosti vodnykh ekosistem s pozitsii gidroekologii. [Assessment of stability and vulnerability of water ecosystems from hydroecology positions]. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geografi ya, 1996, no. 3, pp. 28—34. (In Russian).

7. Kompleksnoe upravlenie prirodopol’zovaniem na shel’fovykh moryakh. [Integrated management of environmental management at the shelf seas]. WWF Rossii. Moscow; Murmansk, 2011. Available at: http://wwf.ru/upload/iblock/33d/complex_plan_web.pdf. (In Russian).

8. Filatov N. N., Terzhevik A. Yu. Beloe more i ego vodosbor pod vliyaniem klimaticheskikh i antropogennykh faktorov. [The White Sea and its reservoir under the infl uence of climatic and anthropogenic factors]. Petrozavodsk, Karel. nauch. tsentr RAN, 2007, 349 p. (In Russian).

9. Filatov N. N., Menshutkin V. V. Problemy otsenki izmenenii ekosistem krupnykh stratifi tsirovannykh vodoemov pod vliyaniem klimata i antropogennykh faktorov. [Problems of assessment of changes of ecosystems of the large stratifi ed reservoirs under the infl uence of climate and anthropogenic factors]. Uch. zap. RGGMU, 2017, no. 48 (9), pp. 120—146. (In Russian).

10. Muzalevskii A. A., Karlin L. N. Ekologicheskie riski: teoriya i praktika. [Environmental risks: theory and practice]. RGGMU. St. Petersburg, 2011, 448 p. (In Russian).

11. Gutman S. S., Basova A. A. Indikatory ustoichivogo razvitiya Arkticheskoi zony Rossiiskoi Federatsii: problema vybora i izmereniya. [Indicators of sustainable development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation: problem of the choice and measurement]. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. 2017, no. 4 (28), pp. 32—48. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2017-4-32-48. (In Russian).

12. Shavykin A. A. Metodika postroeniya kart uyazvimosti pribrezhnykh i morskikh zon ot neſt i. Primer kart dlya Kol’skogo zaliva. [A technique of creation of cards of vulnerability of coastal and sea zones from oil. An example of cards for Kola Bay]. Vestn. Kol’skogo nauch. tsentra RAN, 2015, pp. 113—123. (In Russian).

13. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies: Backgroud Paper no. 3. United Nation Commission on Sustainable Development. New York, 2001, 294 p.

14. Bell S., Morse S. Sustainable indicators: measuring the immeasurable? Padstow, Sornwall, 2012, 251 p. 15. World development Indicators 2017. World Bank Group. Washington DC, 2017. Available at: http://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/26447.

16. The Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). Oslo, 2018. Available at: https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/AMAP-Assessment-2018-Biological-Eff ects-of-Contaminants-on-Arctic-Wildlife-and-Fish-Pre-print/1663.

17. Drozdov V. V., Smirnov N. P., Kosenko A. V. Uchenie o gidrosfere: Kurs lektsii. [The doctrine about the hydrosphere. Course of lectures]. RGGMU. St. Petersburg, 2015, 320 p. (In Russian).

18. Drozdov V. V. Vliyanie kolebanii klimata na dinamiku ekosistem Baltiiskogo i Belogo morei: Monografi ya. [Infl uence of fl uctuations of climate on dynamics of ecosystems of the Baltic and White seas. Monograph]. RGGMU. St. Petersburg, 2015. 230 p. (In Russian).

19. Drozdov V. V., Smirnov N. P. Vliyanie krupnomasshtabnykh tsirkulyatsionnykh protsessov v atmosfere na temperaturnyi rezhim Belomorskogo regiona. [Infl uence of large-scale circulating processes in the atmosphere on temperature condition of the White Sea region]. Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki, 2011, no. 3 (89), pp. 78—88. (In Russian).

20. Babkov A. A., Golikov A. N. Gidrobiokompleksy Belogo morya. [Gidrobiokompleks of the White Sea]. ZIN RAN. Leningrad, 1984, 103 p. (In Russian).

21. Golikov A. N., Babkov A. I., Golikov A. A., Novikov O. K.,Sheremetevskii A. M. Ekosistemy Onezhskogo zaliva i sopredel’nykh uchastkov basseina Belogo morya. [Ecosystems of Onega Bay and adjacent sites of the Basin of the White Sea]. Issledovanie fauny morei, 1985, vol. 33 (41), pp. 20—37. (In Russian).

22. Babkov A. I. Gidrologicheskaya kharakteristika Onezhskogo zaliva Belogo morya. [Hydrological characteristic of Onega Bay of the White Sea]. Issledovanie fauny morei, 1985, vol. 33 (41), pp. 3—10. (In Russian).

23. Naumov A. D., Babkov A. I., Lukanin V. V., Fedyakov V.V. Gidrologicheskaya i biotsenoticheskaya kharakteristika Mezenskogo zaliva Belogo morya. [Gidrologicheskaya and biotsenotichesky characteristic of the Mezen Gulf White Sea]. Ekologicheskie issledovaniya dannykh organizmov Belogo morya. ZIN RAN. Leningrad, 1986, pp. 64—90. (In Russian).

24. Proekt “Morya”. Gidrometeorologiya i gidrokhimiya morei SSSR. Vol. 2. Beloe more. Iss. 1. Gidrometeorologicheskie usloviya. [Seas project. Hydrometeorology and hydrochemistry of the seas of the USSR. Vol. 2. White Sea. Iss. 1. Hydroweather conditions]. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1991, 241 p. (In Russian).

25. Proekt “Morya”. Gidrometeorologiya i gidrokhimiya morei SSSR. Vol. 2: Beloe more. Iss. 2: Gidrokhimicheskie usloviya i okeanologicheskie osnovy formirovaniya bioproduktivnosti. [Hydrometeorology and hydrochemistry of the seas of the USSR. Vol. 2. White Sea. Iss. 2. Hydrochemical conditions and oceanologic bases of formation of bioproductivity]. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1991, 193 p. (In Russian).

26. Babkov A. I. Gidrologiya Belogo morya. [Hydrology of the White Sea]. ZIN RAN. St. Petersburg, 1998, 94 p. (In Russian).

27. Berger V. Ya. Produktsionnyi potentsial Belogo morya. [Productional capacity of the White Sea]. ZIN RAN. St. Petersburg, 2007, 292 p. (In Russian).

28. Sukhotin A., Berger V. Long-term monitoring studies as a powerful tool in marine ecosystem research. Hydrobiologia, 2013, vol. 706, pp. 1—9.

29. Artem’ev S. N. K otsenke sovremennogo sostoyaniya zoobentosnykh soobshchestv Onezhskogo zaliva Belogo morya (po rezul’tatam issledovanii 2015—2016 gg.). [To assessment of the current state of zoobentosny communities of Onega Bay of the White Sea (by results of researches 2015—2016)]. Materialy XIII Vserossiiskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Izuchenie, ratsional’noe ispol’zovanie i okhrana prirodnykh resursov Belogo morya”. ZIN RAN. St. Petersburg, 2017, pp. 12—15. (In Russian).

30. Khoroshev V. G., Polyakov Yu. N., Drozdov V. V. Tekhnogennye riski osvoeniya rossiiskogo arkticheskogo shel’fa. [Technological hazards of development of the Russian Arctic shelf]. V Mezhdunarodnyi forum “Arktika: nastoyashchee i budushchee”: Sbornik dokladov. St. Petersburg, Kongressno-vystavochnyi tsentr “Ekspoforum”, 2015, pp. 160—162. (In Russian).

31. Il’in G. V., Usyagina I. S., Kasatkina N. E. Geoekologicheskoe sostoyanie sredy morei rossiiskogo sektora Arktiki v usloviyakh sovremennykh tekhnogennykh nagruzok. [A geoecological condition of the environment of the seas of the Russian sector of the Arctic in the conditions of modern technogenic loadings]. Vestn. Kol’skogo nauch. tsentra RAN, 2015, no. 2 (21), pp. 82—93. (In Russian).

32. Matishov G. G., Denisov V. V., Dzhenyuk S. L. Integrirovannoe upravlenie prirodopol’zovaniem v shel’fovykh moryakh. [The integrated management of environmental management in the shelf seas]. Izv. RAN. Ser. geograf., 2007, no. 3, pp. 27—40. (In Russian).

33. Matishov G. G., Denisov V. V., Zhichkin A. P. Morskoe prirodopol’zovanie v zapadnom sektore Arktiki: problemy i resheniya. [Sea environmental management in the western sector of the Arctic: problems and decisions]. Vestn. Kol’skogo nauch. tsentra RAN, 2015, no. 2 (21), pp. 103—112. (In Russian).