| ||||
| ||||
Home » Archive of journals » Volume 14, No. 4, 2024 » Density Calculation of the Hydro-network of the Arctic and Subarctic Plain Territories of the Russian Federation Based on a Digital Elevation Model Using GIS Technologies (Case Study of the Arkhangelsk Region) DENSITY CALCULATION OF THE HYDRO-NETWORK OF THE ARCTIC AND SUBARCTIC PLAIN TERRITORIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION BASED ON A DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL USING GIS TECHNOLOGIES (CASE STUDY OF THE ARKHANGELSK REGION)JOURNAL: Volume 14, No. 4, 2024, p. 511-521HEADING: Research activities in the Arctic AUTHORS: Kutinov, Y.G., Mineev, A.L., Chistova, Z.B., Polyakova, E.V. ORGANIZATIONS: N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2024-4-511-521 UDC: 551.4.08.6(470.11) The article was received on: 30.07.2024 Keywords: Arkhangelsk region, digital relief model, Arctic and Subarctic plain territories of the Russian Federation, Geomorphometry, GIS, hydro-network density, tectonic disturbances Bibliographic description: Kutinov, Y.G., Mineev, A.L., Chistova, Z.B., Polyakova, E.V. Density Calculation of the Hydro-network of the Arctic and Subarctic Plain Territories of the Russian Federation Based on a Digital Elevation Model Using GIS Technologies (Case Study of the Arkhangelsk Region). Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. [Arctic: Ecology and Economy], 2024, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 511-521. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2024-4-511-521. (In Russian). Abstract: The authors have developed a program for calculating the density of the channel network of the current relief using SAGA GIS modules to identify low-amplitude tectonic disturbances in the sedimentary cover of the platform arctic and subarctic territories of the Russian Federation. The program allows automating the calculation of the drainage network density using the sequential execution of standard GIS package modules. The calculation takes into account not only the drainage network, but also linear depressions of the relief, which makes it possible to identify structures with increased activity of current tectonics. The authors have calculated the density of the channel network of the representative territory (Arkhangelsk Region) with different “windows”. Comparison of the results with tectonic disturbances have shown a high degree of coincidence. The proposed methodology is applicable to the plain arctic and subarctic territories of the Russian Federation. Finance info: The study was funded by state assignment of the N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the project “Geoecological assessment of the state of the natural environment of the Arctic and subarctic territories of the Russian Federation by means of digital elevation simulation using the example of the north of the Russian Plate”, the state registration number 122011300380-5. References: 1. Bilibina T. V. Block tectonics and geodynamics of the earth’s crust of the north-west of the Russian platform and the principles of forecasting ore-bearing structures. Block tectonics and ore prospects of the Russian Platform. Leningrad, VSEGEI, 1986, pp. 22—29. (In Russian). 2. Grigor’eva S. V., Makarov V. I. Large-scale neotectonic mapping of platform areas (by the example of Moscow). Geoekologiya, inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya geoekologiya [Geoecology, Engineering Geology, Hydrogeology, Geocryology], 2010, no. 3, pp. 99—114. (In Russian). 3. Zlatopol’sky A. A. Multiscale digital terrain map analysis. Experimental regularities. Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa [Modern problems of remote sensing of the Earth from Space], 2015, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 27—35. (In Russian). 4. Ivanchenko G. N., Tubanov Ts. A. Geodynamic zoning of Western Transbaicailia using computer lineament analysis of the digital elevation model. Dinamicheskie processy v geosferakh [Dynamic possesses in geosphere], 2023, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1—22. DOI: 10.26006/29490995_2023_15_3_. (In Russian). 5. Kolodyazhny S. Yu., Terekhov E. N., Baluev A. S. Structural-Kinematic Parageneses and Dynamic Evolution Model of the Baltic-Mezen Shear Zone in the Phanerozoic, the Northern-Western Part of the European Platform. Geotektonika [Geotectonics], 2020, no. 2, pp. 48—74. DOI: 10.31857/S0016853X20020071. (In Russian). 6. Koshel’ S. M., Entin A. L. Evaluating drainage area by digital elevation models based on flow line construction. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 5. Geografiya [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Ser. 5. Geography], 2017, no. 3, pp. 42—50. (In Russian). 7. Kutinov Yu. G., Mineev A. L., Polyakova E. V., Chistova Z. B. The choice of the basic digital elevation model (DEM) of the plain territories of the North of Eurasia and its preparation for geological zoning (on the example of the Arkhangelsk region). Penza, Sotsiosfera, 2019, 176 p. (In Russian). 8. Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B. A hierarchical series of manifestations of kimberlite magmatism of the Arkhangelsk diamondiferous province. Their reflection in geological and geophysical materials. Arkhangelsk, OAO “IPP Pravda Severa”, 2004, 284 p. (In Russian). 9. Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B., Mineev A. L., Polyakova E. V., Neverov N. A. Results of monitoring studies of the processes of intergeospheric interaction in the tectonic nodes of the north of the Russian Plate. Dinamicheskie processy v geosferakh [Dynamic processes in geosphere], 2022, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 10—24. DOI: 10.26006/29490995_2022_14_2_10. (In Russian). 10. Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B., Polyakova E. V., Mineev A. L. The use of digital elevation models (DEM) to identify tectonic structures of ancient platforms (on the example of the north-west of the Russian plate). Penza, Sotsiosfera, 2020, 378 p. (In Russian). 11. Kutinov Yu. G. Eco-Geodynamics of the Arctic segment of the Earth’s crust. Ekaterinburg, UB RAS, 2005, 388 p. (In Russian). 12. Mineev A. L., Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B., Polyakova E. V. Preparation of a digital elevation model for the study of exogenous processes in the northern territories of the Russian Federation. Prostranstvo i Vremya [Space and Time], 2015, no. 3 (21), pp. 278—291. (In Russian). 13. Mineev A. L., Polyakova E. V., Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B. The reliability of a digital elevation model of the Arkhangelsk Region for geoecological research. Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa [Modern problems of remote sensing of the Earth from Space], 2018, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 58—67. DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2018-15-4-58-67. (In Russian). 14. Polyakova E. V. Geoecological Analysis of the Territory of the North of the Russian Plate by Means of Digital Relief Modeling: Possibilities and Practical Application. [Abstract for the Article. Uch. Doctorate Geol-Miner. Sciences]. Moscow, IGE RAS, 2022, 38 p. (In Russian). 15. Polyakova E. V., Kutinov Yu. G., Mineev A. L., Chistova Z. B. An algorithm for calculating basic surfaces based on a digital elevation model in SAGA GIS software: case study of Arkhangelsk region. Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa. [Modern problems of remote sensing of the Earth from Space], 2023, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 104—115. DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2023-20-3-104-115. (In Russian). 16. Polyakova E. V., Kutinov Yu. G., Chistova Z. B., Mineev A. L. Experience of digital elevation modeling for the identification of inheritance of foundation structures in modern relief of the northern part of Russian Plate. Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa. [Modern problems of remote sensing of the Earth from Space], 2019, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 75—83. DOI: 10.21046/2070-7401-2019-16-2-75-83. (In Russian). 17. Sergeev I. S., Egorov I. V. Structural Geomorphology of the White Sea Region Based on Fractal Geometry in a GIS. Izvestiya Russkogo Geograficheskogo Obshchestva [Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society], 2015, vol 147, no. 4, pp. 24—38. (In Russian). 18. Tectonic map of the White Sea and adjacent territories. Scale 1:1 500 000. Ed. by G. S. Kazanin. Moscow, GIN RAS, 2010. (In Russian). 19. Chernova I. Yu., Nugmanov I. I., Dautov A. N. Application of analytical functions of GIS for improvement and development of structural and morphological methods of studying neotectonics. Geoinformatika [Geoinformatics], 2010, no. 4, pp. 9—22. (In Russian). 20. Freeman Ò. Calculating catchment area with divergent flow based on a regular grid. Computers and Geosciences, 1991, vol. 17, pp. 413—422. 21. Mineev A. L., Kutinov Yu. G., Polyakova E. V., Chistova Z. B., Staritsyn V. V. An Algorithm for Constructing a Network of Valleys Using GIS and DEM: Case Study of Arkhangelsk Oblast. Water Resources, 2023, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1200—1203. DOI: 10.1134/S0097807823700604. 22. Quinn P., Beven K., Chevallier P., Planchon O. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling. Hydrological Processes, 1991, vol. 5 (5), pp. 59—79. 23. Strahler A. N. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1957, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 913—920. Download » | ||||
© 2011-2024 Arctic: ecology and economy
DOI 10.25283/2223-4594
|