INDICATORS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ARCTIC ZONE: PROBLEMS OF SELECTION AND MEASUREMENT

The article considers the concept of “sustainable development”. The article also covers types, purposes and particular qualities of sustainable development. In addition the article covers the stages of promoting the concept of the sustainable development. The content of the article includes information about main documents, which underlie the concept of sustainable development: Brundtland Commission Report, United Nations Resolution of the 25 September, 2015, the Paris Agreement and others. The article reflects the concept of the important documents of the policy of sustainable development in the territory of Russian Federation. The article underlie the necessity to adapt modern methods for achieving the goals of sustainable development through an integrated approach, taking into account the economic, social and environmental factors in the development of the Arctic zone (AZ). A comparative analysis of different assessment systems and indicators for four types of sustainable development was conducted: economic (financial), social (socio-cultural), political and institutional sustainability and environmental sustainability. The content of the article includes methods for assessing the sustainable development of economic systems using integrated indicators developed by international communities such as the United Nations, the World Bank, the Wildlife Fund, and some domestic authors. To achieve the goals of sustainable development, it is proposed to use a balanced scorecard (BSС), which would align to a set of existing indicators in accordance with the goals and strategy of sustainable development of the territories of the Arctic Zone. The developed Balance Scorecard System of sustainable development in the Arkhangelsk region is presented for four projections: financial component, internal and external market, infrastructure and innovation, development and modernization. The article also covers results on the similarity between the regions of the Far North-the Murmansk and Arkhangelsk regions.

1. Postanovleniye Pravitelstva RF “O soderzhanii. sostave. poryadke razrabotki i utverzhdeniya strategii prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii, a takzhe o poryadke osushchestvleniya monitoringa i kontrolya eye realizatsii” [The content, composition, procedure for the development and approval of the spatial development strategy of the Russian Federation, as well as the procedure for monitoring and monitoring its implementation] ot 20 avgusta 2015 g. no. 870. Available at: http://economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/strategicPlanning/regulation/201511136. (In Russian).

2. Rasporyazheniye Pravitelstva RF “Ob utverzhdenii Strategii innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2020 goda” [The Strategy for Innovative Development of the Russian Federation for the period until 2020] ot 8 dekabrya 2011 g. no. 2227-r. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_123444/.(In Russian).

3. Panova N. V. Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya. [Economics of sustainable development]. Magist. dis. NIU VShE. Moscow, 2013, 50 p. (In Russian).

4. Ratnikova T. A. Analiz panelnykh dannykh v pakete “stata”: Metodicheskiye ukazaniya k kompyuternomu praktikumu po kursu “Ekonometricheskiy analiz panelnykh dannykh”. [Analysis of panel data in the package “stata”: Methodical instructions to the computer practice at the rate “Econometric analysis of panel data”]. Moscow, 2004, 40 p. (In Russian).

5. Preobrazovaniye nashego mira: Povestka dnya v oblasti ustoychivogo razvitiya na period do 2030 goda. Rezolyutsiya, prinyataya Generalnoy Assambleyey OON 25 sentyabrya 2015 goda. [Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly on September 25, 2015. Transformation of Our World: An Agenda for Sustainable Development for the period until 2030]. Available at: http://unctad.org/meetings/en/SessionalDocuments/ares70d1_ru.pdf. (In Russian).

6. Doklad o razvitii chelovecheskogo potentsiala v Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2009: Energetika i ustoychivoye razvitiye. [Report on Human Development in the Russian Federation 2009. Energy and sustainable development]. Moscow, PROON, 2010, 184 p. (In Russian).

7. Budushcheye, kotorogo my khotim: Itogovyy dokument Konferentsii OON po ustoychivomu razvitiyu. Rio-de-Zhaneyro. Braziliya. 20—22 iyunya 2012 g. [The future that we want. 2012. The final document of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil]. Rio de Janeiro, 2012, 66 p. Available at: http://www.iblfrussia.org/a-conf.216-l-1_russian.pdf.pdf. (In Russian).

8. Grigoryev L. M., Kurdin A. A. Doklad o chelovecheskom razvitii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Ustoychivoye razvitiye: vyzovy RIO. Gl. 5: Energeticheskaya effektivnost: klyuchevoy element novoy ekonomiki. [Report on Human Development of the Russian Federation. Sustainable development: challenges of RIO. Chapter 5: Energy efficiency: a key element of the new economy]. Moscow, PROON, 2013, pp. 102—116. (In Russian).

9. Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. UN. New York, 2015, 15 p.

10. Doklad o chelovecheskom razvitii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2015 god. [Report on Human Development in the Russian Federation for 2015]. Pod red. L. M. Grigoryeva i S. N. Bobyleva. Moscow, Analit. tsentr pri Pravitelstve Ros. Federatsii, 2015, 260 p. (In Russian).

11. Framing Sustainable Development Goals, Targets, and Indicators. Prepared by the SDSN Secretariat. [S. l.], 2014, 9 p. Available at: http://unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/141120-Framing-Goals-Targets-and-Indicators.pdf.

12. Universal Sustainable Development Goals. Understanding the Transformational Challenge for Developed Countries: Report of a Study by Stakeholder Forum. [S. l.], 2015, 25 p.

13. Indicators for Sustainable Development: guidelines and methodologies. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org.

14. Indicators for the Integration of Environmental Concerns to Transport Policies. Working Group on the State of the Environment. [S. l.], OECD, 1999.

15. Osama A. B. Hassan Assessing the sustainability of a region in the light of composite indicators. J. of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2008, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 51—65.

16. Tarasova N. P., Kruchina E. B. Indeksy i indikatory ustoychivogo razvitiya. [Indices and indicators of sustainable development]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii “Ustoychivoye razvitiye: priroda — obshchestvo — chelovek”. [Proceedings of the international conference “Sustainable Development: Nature — Society — Man”]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2006, pp. 127—144. (In Russian).

17. Skawińska E., Zalewski R. I. Role of clusters in sustainable development in the context of social market economy theory. Case of Poland. IMETI 2009 — 2nd International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technological Innovation. Poznań, Poland, 2009. — pp. 136—141.

18. Rekomendatsii Konferentsii evropeyskikh statistikov dlya izmereniya ustoychivogo razvitiya. [Recommendations of the Conference of European Statisticians for Measuring Sustainable Development]. Evropeyskaya ekonomicheskaya komissiya Organizatsii Obyedinennykh Natsiy. Available at: http://www.cisstat.com/sdgs/ECE_CES_31_Rus.pdf. (In Russian).

19. Bell S., Morse S. Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable? Padstow, Cornwall, 2012, 251 p.

20. Expanding the Measure of Wealth: Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development. The World Bank. Washington, DC, 1997. (Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs Series no. 17).

21. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies: Backgroud Paper no. 3. United Nation Commission on Sustainable Development. — New York, 2001. 294 p.

22. World development Indicators 2017. World Bank Group. Washington DC, 2017. Available at: http://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/26447.

23. Nashe obshcheye budushcheye. Doklad Mezhdunarodnoy komissii po okruzhayushchey srede i razvitiyu. [Our common future. Report of the International Commission on Environment and Development]. Moscow, Progress, 1989, 21 p. (In Russian).

24. Kasimov N. S., Mazurov Yu. L., Tikunov V. S. Kontseptsiya ustoychivogo razvitiya: vospriyatiye v Rossii. [The concept of sustainable development: perception in Russia]. Vestn. Ros. Akad. nauk, 2004, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 28—36. (In Russian).

25. Minnekayeva D. R. “Povestka dnya na XXI vek” — put k ustoychivomu razvitiyu: Teoreticheskiye osnovy perspektivnoy programmy Organizatsii Obyedinennykh Natsiy. [Agenda for the 21st Century — the way to a sustainable Development: Theoretical Foundations of the United Nations Prospective Program]. Vestn. TISBI, 2003, no. 4, pp. 168—172. (In Russian).

26. Veber A. Vozmozhno li ustoychivoye razvitiye? [Is sustainable development possible?]. Svobod. mysl, 1998, no. 5, pp. 42—55. (In Russian).

27. Sukhorukova T. V. Ekonomicheskaya ustoychivost predpriyatiya. [Economic sustainability of the enterprise]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 2001, no. 5, pp. 48—52. (In Russian).

28. Syrov A. N. Otsenka ekonomicheskogo potentsiala territorii. [Assessment of the economic potential of the territory]. Vestn. Volgograd. gos. un-ta. Ser. 3. Ekonomika. ekologiya, 2008, no. 2 (13), pp. 98—102. (In Russian).

29. Uskova T. V. Upravleniye ustoychivym razvitiyem regiona: Monografiya. [Managed Sustainable development of the region): monograph]. Vologda, ISERT RAN, 2009, 355 p. (In Russian).

30. Shamardin D. N. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskoye razvitiye regiona cherez klastery. [Social and economic development of the region through clusters]. Ros. predprinimatelstvo, 2013, no. 13 (235), pp. 30—37. (In Russian).

31. Tsiganov V. V., Tunova E. Yu. Tipy ustoychivogo razvitiya regionalnykh sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh sistem Rossii. [Types of sustainable development of regional socio-economic systems of Russia]. Ros. gumanitar. zhur, 2012, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73—77. 32. Ursul A. D., Los V. A. Ustoychivoye razvitiye. [Sustainable development]. Moscow: Agar, 2000, 254 p. (In Russian).

33. Gibson E. Supporting sustainable technology cluster development: A performance measurement problem (Conference Paper). Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, 2014.

34. Adamisin P., Vavrek R., Pukala R. Cluster analysis of central and Southeast Europe countries via selected indicators of sustainable development. SGEM2015 Conference Proceedings. [S. l.], 2015, pp. 135—140.

35. Kaplan R. Strategicheskiye karty: Transformatsiya nematerialnykh aktivov v materialnyye rezultaty. [Strategic Maps: Transformation of Intangible Assets into Material Results]. Per. s angl. Moscow, ZAO “Olimp-Biznes”. 2005, 512 p. (In Russian).

36. Porter M. E. Location. competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Esonomic Development Quart, 2000, 14, pp. 15—34.

37. Zarubin S. A. Semanticheskiye znacheniya integralnogo pokazatelya ustoychivosti regionalnoy ekonomiki. [Semantic meanings Integral index of the stability of the regional economy]. Izv. Irkut. gos. ekon. akad, 2012, no. 1 (81). pp. 87—90. (In Russian).

38. Taranenko I. V. Otsenka sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo potentsiala regionov. [Assessment of socio-economic potential of regions]. Dnepropetr. un-t ekonomiki i prava. Dnepropetrovsk, 2010, 12 p. (In Russian).

39. SDG Index & Dashboards: A global report (full version). Available at: http://www.sdgindex.org/.40. Prinyatiye Parizhskogo soglasheniya: PredlozheniyePredsedatelya: Proyekt resheniya -/SR.21. [Framework Convention on Climate Change]. OON. Ramochnaya konventsiya ob izmeneniya klimata. [S. l.], 2015, 42 p. Available at: https://scientificrussia.ru/data/shared/2015/12/l09r.pdf. (In Russian).

41. Barlybayev Kh. A. Izbrannyye trudy: v 4 t. Vol. 1: Ustoychivoye razvitiye. Globalistika. [Selected Works. In the 4th vol. 1: Sustainable development. Globalistics]. Moscow, Izd. dom “Nauch. b-ka”, 2014, 39 p. (In Russian).

42. Tsapiyeva O. K. Ustoychivoye razvitiye regiona: teoreticheskiye osnovy i model. [Sustainable development of the region: theoretical basis and model]. Problemy sovrem. ekonomiki, 2010, no. 2, pp. 307—311. (In Russian).

43. Ozkan R., Schott S. Sustainable Development and Capabilities for the Polar Region. Social Indicators Research, 2013, vol. 114, pp. 1259—1283.

44. Zeijl-Rozema A., Ferraguto L., Caratti P. Comparing region-specific sustainability assessments through indicator systems: Feasible or not? Ecological Economics [Elsevier], 2011, 70 (3), pp. 475—486.

45. Wyckoff A., Colecchia A. The Economic and Social Impact of Electronic Commerce / Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). [S. l.], 1999, 168 p.

46. Neudakhina Yu. G. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskiye aspekty upravleniya ustoychivym razvitiyem regiona. [Organizational-economic aspects of sustainable development in the region]. Dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk. Nalchik, 2011, 233 p. (In Russian).

47. Nauchnaya osnova strategii ustoychivogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. [The scientific basis of the sustainable development strategy Russian Federation]. Pod obshch. red. M. Ch. Zalikhanova. V. M. Matrosova. A. M. Shelekhova. Moscow, 2002, 392 p. (In Russian).

48. Gutman S. S., Teslya A. B. Dostizheniye ustoychivogo razvitiya monoprofilnykh poseleniy Murmanskoy oblasti. [Achievement of sustainable development of mono-profile settlements in the Murmansk region]. Vestn. MGTU, 2016, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 383—391. (In Russian).

49. Kozlov A. V., Fedoseyev S. V., Cherepovitsyn A. E. et al. Kompleksnoye razvitiye ekonomicheskogo prostranstva Arkticheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii. [Complex development of the economic space of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation]. St. Petersburg, SPbPU, 2016, 315 p. (In Russian).

50. Postanovleniye Pravitelstva Arkhangelskoy oblasti “Ob utverzhdenii programmy razvitiya sudostroitelnogo innovatsionnogo territorialnogo klastera Arkhangelskoy oblasti na 2014—2017 gody” ot 7 oktyabrya 2014 g. № 390-pp (s izmeneniyami na 28 iyulya 2015 g.). [The program for the development of the shipbuilding innovative territorial cluster of the Arkhangelsk region for 2014—2017) (as amended on July 28, 2015]. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/462610136. (In Russian).