THE ROLE OF SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS OF ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN THE REVENUE FORMATION OF ORGANIZATIONS

The preferential regime of the Russian Arctic has a “continuous” nature of the implementation of measures throughout the macro-region, manifested differently at the regional and municipal levels. The study aim is to identify the mutual influence of the territories of the European part of the Russian Arctic in the formation of local relationships between the main factors of production — labor and capital on the revenue formation of organizations. The object of the study is 37 municipalities of the European part of the Russian Arctic. The researchers use the Cobb-Douglas model, global and local Moran indices, spatial econometric models based on neighborhood matrices and inverse distances along roads. They have identified two main types of local relationships of municipalities: “Low-Low” and “Low-High”, as well as a sporadically occurring type “High-High”. The model based on the matrix of inverse distances along roads has showed the greatest efficiency. The researchers have determined the predominant contribution of the labor factor (average number of employees of organizations) to the increase in revenue of organizations within the framework of direct and indirect effects. In order to achieve spatial synergy in socio-economic development when improving incentive measures, it is advisable to take into account not only the internal structure of the economies of municipalities, but also aspects of local and macro-regional spatial relationships.

1. Kuznetsova O. V. Economic Differentiation of Municipalities of the Russian Arctic and their Receptivity to Federal Preferential Treatment. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of regions], 2024, no. 20 (2), pp. 462—476. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-2-8. (In Russian).

2. Volkov A. D., Roslyakova N. A., Vasilieva A. V., Averyanov A. O., Tishkov S. V., Nalivaychenko E. V. Preferential Regime of the Russian Arctic: Tendencies and First Results from Realization of the World’s Largest Special Economic Zone. J. of Risk and Financial Management, 2024, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 28. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm17010028.

3. Economic space of the Russian Arctic and pension reform: assessments, risks, consequences. Ed. by T. P. Skufina, E. A. Korchak, O. V. Gubina. Apatity, KSC RAS Publ., 2022, 242 p. DOI: 10.37614/978.5.91137.473.0. (In Russian).

4. Leonov S. N., Zaostrovskikh E. A. Influence of the Ports of the Northern Sea Route on the Formation of Focal Zones for the Development of the Eastern Arctic. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 6—18. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2021-1-6-18. (In Russian).

5. Lazhentsev V. N. Socio-Economic Space and Territorial Development of the North and the Arctic of Russia. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of regions], 2018, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 353—365. (In Russian).

6. Emelyanova E. E. Socio-economic situation and investment activities of municipalities of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation: development problems. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2019, no. 4 (66), pp. 29—42. DOI: 10.25702/KSC.2220-802X-4-2019-66-29-42. (In Russian).

7. Kotov A. V. Preferential treatment propagation in the implementation of investment projects for the industrial development of the Russian Arctic territory. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 297—309. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2023-2-297-309. (In Russian).

8. Koshkin V. New developments in the regulations of the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation: Continuity and change. The Polar J., 2020, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 443—458. DOI: 10.1080/2154896X.2020.1848711.

9. Odintsova A. V. Preferential Territories in the Spatial Development of the Russian Federation. Federalizm [Federalism], 2023, vol. 28, no. 2 (110), pp. 27—46. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2023-2-27-46. (In Russian).

10. Volkov A. D., Roslyakova N. A., Sleptsov R. S., Nikitina A. S. A method for measuring the performance of the Russian Arctic as a special economic zone: Accounting for regional specificities. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2024, no. 3, pp. 7—26. DOI: 10.37614/2220-802X.3.2024.85.001. (In Russian).

11. Roslyakova N. A., Volkov A. D. Preferential treatment effectiveness for enterprises of the Russian Arctic: tools and evaluation results. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, 2024, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 238—248. DOI: 10.25283/22234594-2024-2-238-248. (In Russian).

12. Bogachev V. F., Mikulenok A. S. Restructuring Arctic regions management system. Ekonomika Severo-Zapada: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Economics of the North-West: problems and development prospects], 2020, no. 2—3 (61—62), pp. 84—93. (In Russian).

13. Afanasiev A. A., Ponomareva O. S. Macroeconomic production function of Russia and estimation of the marginal rate of technical substitution in the unprecedented socio-economic realities of 2020—2022. Biznes-Informatika [Business Informatics], 2022, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 82—104. DOI: 10.17323/2587-814X.2022.4.82.104. (In Russian).

14. Tobler W. R. A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 1970, vol. 46, pp. 234—240. DOI: 10.2307/143141.

15. Giltman M. A., Antosik L. V., Varlamova J. A., Larionova N. I. Impact of the number of employees on wages and housing prices in Russian regions. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic issues], 2022, no. 8, pp. 95—117. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-8-95-117. (In Russian).

16. Semerikova E. V., Demidova O. A. Analysis of regional unemployment in Russia and Germany: a spatial-econometric approach. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 2015, no. 2, pp. 64—85. (In Russian).